Charlie Adam

[Gwylan]

They probably want another player who can understand Greer and Murphy

 

[Lurchy]

He would not come as back-up so who are you going to drop? Stephens, Keyal? For a big time Charlie that wants to score from the half way line?
We wouldn't pay his wages so it's a no brainer.

Also Wolves to Sheffield is just about commutable. If he went to them then he wouldn't need to move away from his family - that stuff can play a big factor on where a player ends up.

 

[Justice]

Fatty Adams is his nickname up North.

 

[Johnny RoastBeef]

Fatty Adams is his nickname up North.

Jan Molby was also a bit of a Lardy, but he did alright.

Stick Adams between a couple of mobile players like Kayal and Stephens and he would fit in nicely, pinging those lovely 40 yard passes for Wilson to run onto. Yes please.

 

[Tony Le Mesmer]

Seeing as he is Scottish, based in Stoke now and has only played north of Watford, forget it - but what do I know....

 

[crabface]

There would be no pies left for us.

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

If he was up for the fight it would be amazing, slightly concerned he would just be here for a paycheck though.

Also, we have midfielders coming out of our ears as it is.

If Kayal and Stephens weren't playing we would be a weaker team with the "others". Adam is better than the majority of what we have, so I'm in.

 

[BUTTERBALL]

Quality player, would be a fantastic signing although i thought he was older than 30, so we'd get a few decent years out of him.

 

[papajaff]

It's a yes from me. Too many cream puffs in our midfield.

 

[Return of the Rev]

One of those players I've always had an irrational dislike of.

So it's a "no" from me.

Your enemy is my enemy! So another no! Unless you change your mind of course

 

[terryberry1]

Absolute tosser but i'd have him. Great passer and has goals in him.

 

[Bozza]

Interested to hear how people would see a starting XI with Adam in the squad.

 

[Soulman]

I think he is past it now.

 

[LamieRobertson]

He is the kind of player you want on your side rather than playing against you and the type of player we need.

But not a left back

 

[Stumpy Tim]

He would be a cracking signing. One of our weaknesses this season has been the reliance on Kayal and Stephens. Adam is a huge upgrade on Crofts who appears to be third choice in there. We would be able to rotate Adam with Kayal & Stephens, and having those three in the centre when we put five in midfield would be tremendous.

It's a big yes for me

 

[GT49er]

Interested to hear how people would see a starting XI with Adam in the squad.

4-3-3 perhaps, or maybe 4-4-2, but with only one winger, who would swap wings. Or perhaps like Stumpy Tim suggests, rotate our three CMs.

Think I'll just leave it for CH to work out..............................
(Personally I can't see this deal happening, somehow)

 

[GloryDays]

Interested to hear how people would see a starting XI with Adam in the squad.

2nd name on the team sheet, after DS.

 

[GT49er]

Duplicate post

 

[Megazone]

I'd play Adams in the 'quarter-back position' (I hate using that term)

 

[Albumen]

A thug but a bloody good one at this level. There's no way Hughes will let him go in this window though.