Cameron's Conservatives 4% lead.

[Leekbrookgull]

According to REUTERS.http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/10/uk-britain-election-poll-idUKKBN0M611V20150310

 

[SteveTheSeagull]

Blooming well hope not.

 

[TomandJerry]

Well thats the police force doomed

 

[glasfryn]

Well thats the police force doomed

everybody is doomed I tell yee, doomed

 

[spence]

I really don't know who to vote for. Was going to vote UKIP but i want the Tories out and Labour is my best bet i guess.

 

[glasfryn]

I really don't know who to vote for. Was going to vote UKIP but i want the Tories out and Labour is my best bit i guess.

depends on where you are?

 

[spence]

depends on where you are?

Labour strong hold Crawley

 

[easynow]

Labour would likely be leading if it was eds brother instead.

 

[Vegas Seagull]

According to REUTERS.http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/10/uk-britain-election-poll-idUKKBN0M611V20150310

Do we ignore the thread with just 2165 better posts on this topic?

 

[Vegas Seagull]

I really don't know who to vote for. Was going to vote UKIP but i want the Tories out and Labour is my best bet i guess.

The thinking mans voter

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

Do we ignore the thread with just 2165 better posts on this topic?

I was going to say, if only we had a thread where we have been discussing this for the past 6 months.

 

[BensGrandad]

Hopefully could be heading for an overall majority rather than a coalition with no hopers.

 

[goldstone]

Since when were they "Cameron's Conservatives"? I thought the party was known as the Conservative Party. It's like the signs on the M40 for Shakespeare's Stratford.

I shall be voting UKIP this year as the only party whose policies pretty much all make sense. Sure they've got some nutters in the party, but which party hasn't? The worst possible outcome would be a Labour win (very unlikely) or any kind of coalition with Labour involved. Oh, and anything giving the Greens even a sniff of power. In Mid Sussex my vote for UKIP is unlikely to unseat the Conservative candidate, but it will send a strong protest-vote message.

 

[goldstone]

Do we ignore the thread with just 2165 better posts on this topic?

Any thread with that many posts is far too long and should be given a decent burial.

 

[Rookie]

When the opposition are inept that is what happens.

 

[Leekbrookgull]

Do we ignore the thread with just 2165 better posts on this topic?

Why not.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

Since when were they "Cameron's Conservatives"? I thought the party was known as the Conservative Party. It's like the signs on the M40 for Shakespeare's Stratford.

I shall be voting UKIP this year as the only party whose policies pretty much all make sense. Sure they've got some nutters in the party, but which party hasn't? The worst possible outcome would be a Labour win (very unlikely) or any kind of coalition with Labour involved. Oh, and anything giving the Greens even a sniff of power. In Mid Sussex my vote for UKIP is unlikely to unseat the Conservative candidate, but it will send a strong protest-vote message.

each to his own. I don't think that any of UKIP's policies make sense....... and yes, I have read their policy stuff on their website..

 

[melias shoes]

I was going to say, if only we had a thread where we have been discussing this for the past 6 months.

 

[StonehamPark]

My vote's going to UKIP this term.
Got to be better than what the other con-artists are offering.

 

[midnight_rendezvous]

My vote's going to UKIP this term.
Got to be better than what the other con-artists are offering.

Surely UKIP are the biggest con artists going as they are pretending to be an alternative yet offering more of the same