Home to get my vodka and thought I might write before I drink it...
I disagree. They have problems with tone and levels, both of which they have the (not easy) "responsibility" of setting. No secret I am struggling with the tone of one the moderators and it is from personal experience, coming here and engaging mainly in football threads, enjoying the place while trying to be respectful and even helpful (the not so bright Barber mail was intended as such).
Then one day venturing into a political thread, watching this moderator humilitate, abuse and attack someone for about ten pages in a thread. That sort of changes things. Its like watching the team captain headbutt a referee... the rest of the players will just drop any respectfulness and there will be screaming and handbags all over the place in no time. The respect you have for the discussion climate just drops dead to the ground when observing admins or mods throwing shit around like rabid monkeys. It changes the tone of the entire board, something that amplifies when sensible people get enough of it and just stop posting or visiting.
The other factor, levels, has also been an obvious struggle here, there's been inconsistency in the level of tolerance. When someone gets a "short ban for circumventing the swear filter" while you have Pretty pinky fairy popping up doing nothing but agitating or trolling in every thread, it just makes people annoyed, confused and unsure if there are any rules and what those rules are... just gets confusing: whats the ****ing level? Is this a day we can make some funny Auschwitz jokes or is it a day where we'll be banned for a month for saying ACAB? Recently the level has been clear though, pretty lawless here.
Does these things mean that I think NSC is a bad forum or that most of the admins and mods are not doing a good job? Not really, it just means that I think NSC is trying to be something that is very difficult to be, with all the advantages and disadvantages it results in.
But things could change a bit I think, like:
1. There needs to be a set of rules pinned that people can refer to when things go overboard. Today if someone says "you're doing personal attacks" you have to scratch your beard and think "ok.. so is that good or bad?" (exaggerated but you get the gist).
2. Mods need to behave or its not going to work out. It has way too much impact. Learn and improve or step down and join us deadly people again.
3. Creating two main boards, one for football and one for everything else might be a good idea. Yes, it is scary, I like the current mix and I don't like the thought of it... but it probably is a good idea for the general atmosphere.
4. Create a very strict "don't call new members Palace, Mustafa, vagabond, Timmy or anything of that sort until they have at least.. 2 posts". Anyone new posting anything here goes through this massive trial that must be very, very weird and off-putting if they're actually just... new. And this place would not go under with fresh blood, but it might without.
5. This one is controversial but the need for it is increasing as clubs, players, their families etc. get more and more aware of what happens on the Internet: staff and players need to be treated as if they're actual human beings living nearby most of you folks. Criticism or saying "I want a new player instead of X" is one thing but things like "Judas ****", "this player is an idiot" or "this player is ugly"... it needs to go I think.
NSC is good but there's room for improvement. Gentrification and normalisation ain't nice but sometimes you need a slice.
Weeell you've passed the 2 post limit so hi there baker_lite.
The main reason I believe OP on this is because one of the very, very few proven ITKs here insinuated that there was "more to this" when the note on the door thing appeared. The "more to this" is probably what this thread is about.
Firstly any abuse to Bruno and his family is utterly despicable and totally deplorable.
Secondly I too was upset but fully understood the magnitude too the decision to not only himself but first and foremost his family and their security financially.
Thirdly your comments about social media are probably correct, I don’t partake in Twitter or Facebook precisely for the faceless abuse and pure trolling by some folk. I do however disagree about your comment on NSC, I feel NSC is not like that as a general rule, and if anyone does step out of line not only do Bozza and the team step in, we police ourselves and call people out.
I disagree. They have problems with tone and levels, both of which they have the (not easy) "responsibility" of setting. No secret I am struggling with the tone of one the moderators and it is from personal experience, coming here and engaging mainly in football threads, enjoying the place while trying to be respectful and even helpful (the not so bright Barber mail was intended as such).
Then one day venturing into a political thread, watching this moderator humilitate, abuse and attack someone for about ten pages in a thread. That sort of changes things. Its like watching the team captain headbutt a referee... the rest of the players will just drop any respectfulness and there will be screaming and handbags all over the place in no time. The respect you have for the discussion climate just drops dead to the ground when observing admins or mods throwing shit around like rabid monkeys. It changes the tone of the entire board, something that amplifies when sensible people get enough of it and just stop posting or visiting.
The other factor, levels, has also been an obvious struggle here, there's been inconsistency in the level of tolerance. When someone gets a "short ban for circumventing the swear filter" while you have Pretty pinky fairy popping up doing nothing but agitating or trolling in every thread, it just makes people annoyed, confused and unsure if there are any rules and what those rules are... just gets confusing: whats the ****ing level? Is this a day we can make some funny Auschwitz jokes or is it a day where we'll be banned for a month for saying ACAB? Recently the level has been clear though, pretty lawless here.
Does these things mean that I think NSC is a bad forum or that most of the admins and mods are not doing a good job? Not really, it just means that I think NSC is trying to be something that is very difficult to be, with all the advantages and disadvantages it results in.
But things could change a bit I think, like:
1. There needs to be a set of rules pinned that people can refer to when things go overboard. Today if someone says "you're doing personal attacks" you have to scratch your beard and think "ok.. so is that good or bad?" (exaggerated but you get the gist).
2. Mods need to behave or its not going to work out. It has way too much impact. Learn and improve or step down and join us deadly people again.
3. Creating two main boards, one for football and one for everything else might be a good idea. Yes, it is scary, I like the current mix and I don't like the thought of it... but it probably is a good idea for the general atmosphere.
4. Create a very strict "don't call new members Palace, Mustafa, vagabond, Timmy or anything of that sort until they have at least.. 2 posts". Anyone new posting anything here goes through this massive trial that must be very, very weird and off-putting if they're actually just... new. And this place would not go under with fresh blood, but it might without.
5. This one is controversial but the need for it is increasing as clubs, players, their families etc. get more and more aware of what happens on the Internet: staff and players need to be treated as if they're actual human beings living nearby most of you folks. Criticism or saying "I want a new player instead of X" is one thing but things like "Judas ****", "this player is an idiot" or "this player is ugly"... it needs to go I think.
NSC is good but there's room for improvement. Gentrification and normalisation ain't nice but sometimes you need a slice.
Once again, death threats should be reported to the Police asap and online abuse condemned, but, as it stands ... an entire thread full of opinions based on hearsay with no verifiable evidence of even one threatening or abusive/unacceptable comment apparently posted online plus some bloke from Sweden trying to push an agenda.
Weeell you've passed the 2 post limit so hi there baker_lite.
The main reason I believe OP on this is because one of the very, very few proven ITKs here insinuated that there was "more to this" when the note on the door thing appeared. The "more to this" is probably what this thread is about.