Bruno is a major accident waiting to happen....came close to happening today several times. How Calde doesn't get in ahead of him, I have no idea.
Bruno = 5 parts brilliant and 5 parts disastrous.
Upson = bloody awful first half, better in the second but way off form.
I cannot understand all the criticism of Bruno for me he does the job adequately and is better defensively and attacking than Calderon and most people conveniently forget that on most occasions when he was out of the side injured the pressure put on our back four nearly always came down our right. Other scouts had spotted the weakness and teams played on it. I am not a statistician to quote games but I remember on many occasion teams attacking Calderon with great success.
Would that be the Forest that put a couple past Leicester, and Yeovil that are bottom?Funny, it always looks like we're more vulnerable with Bruno at RB, but since he's come in and played there, our defensive record has OK. Clean sheets v Yeovil & Blackburn, deflected shot against Watford and a scrappy free kick v Doncaster. Don't forget Calderon was RB against Forest.
3-5-2 would suit both Bruno and Ward, I would be in favour of trying it.
I agree and I think he is slowly coming back to form. Reading the majority of comments on this thread I'm feeling pretty out of step with most on this.. I'd take Bruno over Calde everytime.
Never looks fit Bruno, but he has a lovely touch and great control. I think he is an asset.
Is '5 parts good/5 parts bad' the same as '1 part good/1 part bad'?
Never looks fit Bruno, but he has a lovely touch and great control. I think he is an asset.
Bruno has been dreadful for ages... Why we bother when Calderon is a better alternative I don't understand
The best performances I remember are with Buckley ahead of him. Bruno played quite a few decent through balls at the weekend. He should stick to that, and trying to defend.Bruno plays better with Buckley in front of him.