Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Bruno and Upson



Jim in the West

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 13, 2003
4,957
Way out West
Bruno is a major accident waiting to happen....came close to happening today several times. How Calde doesn't get in ahead of him, I have no idea.
 




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
I cannot understand all the criticism of Bruno for me he does the job adequately and is better defensively and attacking than Calderon and most people conveniently forget that on most occasions when he was out of the side injured the pressure put on our back four nearly always came down our right. Other scouts had spotted the weakness and teams played on it. I am not a statistician to quote games but I remember on many occasion teams attacking Calderon with great success.
 


Cowfold Seagull

Fan of the 17 bus
Apr 22, 2009
22,119
Cowfold
Bruno = 5 parts brilliant and 5 parts disastrous.

Upson = bloody awful first half, better in the second but way off form.

I actually thought Bruno was ten parts disastrous, with Buckley missing from the starting line-up he seems to consider himself far more of a right-winger than a right-back. He would sprint forward on some ill advised foray deep into the Blackburn half, promptly lose the ball, then lack the speed or energy to get back. Calderon is, for me, a much safer option at right back.

Like you, l thought Matt Upson was decidedly 'iffy' early in the game, but the longer it went on the more he got into it. I thought in the second half he did quite well.
 


Soulman

New member
Oct 22, 2012
10,966
Sompting
The defence are doing well. Considering neither the midfield or attack/wingers has been settled due to injuries, they have coped and adapted.
 


backson

Registered Mis-user
Jul 26, 2004
2,430
Funny, it always looks like we're more vulnerable with Bruno at RB, but since he's come in and played there, our defensive record has OK. Clean sheets v Yeovil & Blackburn, deflected shot against Watford and a scrappy free kick v Doncaster. Don't forget Calderon was RB against Forest.
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
I cannot understand all the criticism of Bruno for me he does the job adequately and is better defensively and attacking than Calderon and most people conveniently forget that on most occasions when he was out of the side injured the pressure put on our back four nearly always came down our right. Other scouts had spotted the weakness and teams played on it. I am not a statistician to quote games but I remember on many occasion teams attacking Calderon with great success.

I agree and I think he is slowly coming back to form. Reading the majority of comments on this thread I'm feeling pretty out of step with most on this.. I'd take Bruno over Calde everytime.
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
Funny, it always looks like we're more vulnerable with Bruno at RB, but since he's come in and played there, our defensive record has OK. Clean sheets v Yeovil & Blackburn, deflected shot against Watford and a scrappy free kick v Doncaster. Don't forget Calderon was RB against Forest.
Would that be the Forest that put a couple past Leicester, and Yeovil that are bottom?
 


blockhseagull

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2006
7,364
Southampton
Baffled by those who seem to think Bruno is a better option than Calde.

The only attribute Bruno has over Calderon is pace, they both have their weaknesses defending but Bruno's poor passing, fancy flicks and inability to track back make Calderon head and shoulders above him as a solid performer.

Calderon was caught out a couple of times last season against pacey wingers such as Zaha but Bruno seems to be outplayed by every winger he plays against.
 




brightonrock

Dodgy Hamstrings
Jan 1, 2008
2,482
I was fuming at Bruno's role in the free header for Rhodes. Having bust a gut getting forward he casually jogged back as Lopez sprinted full pelt 70 yards to fill in cover for him. Eventually Bruno got back in position, and Lopez pointed to the guy he'd tracked back, to say "you take him now". Lopez closes down the full back, who passes to Bruno's winger in acres of space, because Bruno is bending over fifteen yards away, pulling his socks up. Cross, header, should've been a goal. If it had gone in there would've been questions of the marking in the middle but Bruno would largely have been to blame because he switched off, even after someone else did his job for him. Lopez was going mental at him which says a lot, he's not the 'shoutiest' player but he was livid, and rightly so.

The first half a dozen games he had for us, Bruno was brilliant. I genuinely can't remember a game since when he hasn't been a liability. Calderon should be in ahead of him on merit atm. A genuine mystery how Bruno keeps getting the nod.
 


jgmcdee

New member
Mar 25, 2012
931
3-5-2 would suit both Bruno and Ward, I would be in favour of trying it.

We were playing with three at the back for most of the game, so I think you can consider it tried. As to its efficacy, I thought that the main reason that Bruno was considered poor was that he was out of his expected position, but for much of the game he was the only real option to get the ball out from the back. Ward looked lost without Lua Lua to pass to, so everything went to the right for much of the game.
 


ferring seagull

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2010
4,607
There is perhaps not that much to choose between them but certainly neither has much pace.

Looking ahead, and if we want to progress, we need to find a right back who can help take the team forward.
 




GoingUp

Well-known member
Aug 14, 2011
3,698
Sussex By The Sea
Bruno had a shocker, I thought Upson played well.

Im hoping Bruno just has to settle in after being out for awhile, I just hope he doesnt cost us any points whlist setteling in! What pissed me off yesterday was when he lost the ball going foreward, he didnt make a great effort to get back.
 


One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
23,011
Worthing
I agree and I think he is slowly coming back to form. Reading the majority of comments on this thread I'm feeling pretty out of step with most on this.. I'd take Bruno over Calde everytime.

Yes, me as well. Neither are good enough, but Calderon is poor defensively and easily outpaced.

Bruno, as somebody stated earlier in the thread is an accident waiting to happen, but I think is just better than Calderon.

Why Upson is even mentioned is beyond me, I agree he is off form and was disappointing in the first half distribution wise, but provided cover time annd time again. I feel he is comfortably our best defender.
 


Dunk

Member
Jul 27, 2011
279
Lewes
Never looks fit Bruno, but he has a lovely touch and great control. I think he is an asset.

Is '5 parts good/5 parts bad' the same as '1 part good/1 part bad'?
 






Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
Never looks fit Bruno, but he has a lovely touch and great control. I think he is an asset.

That he does, making him unable to pass the ball down the line, without kicking it into touch, all the more puzzling.
 




father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,653
Under the Police Box
Bruno has been dreadful for ages... Why we bother when Calderon is a better alternative I don't understand

THIS THIS THIS.... Bruno has made so, so many shocking mistakes and is generally just cruising through the games. 20 mins of brilliance and 70 of indifference is not good enough. How he has kept his starting spot escapes me!
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,227
Goldstone
Bruno plays better with Buckley in front of him.
The best performances I remember are with Buckley ahead of him. Bruno played quite a few decent through balls at the weekend. He should stick to that, and trying to defend.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here