Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

British man killed by Bull



CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,097
But if your pity for the bull in the ring is the manner of its death, should you not also take into account the quality (and length) of its life prior to its date with destiny ?

I don't agree with breeding animals for blood sports at all.

Consumption - yes
Blood sports - no
 




vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,273
I thought this thread was be the weekly comment and update from Harty ?
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,425
Location Location
I don't agree with breeding animals for blood sports at all.

Consumption - yes
Blood sports - no

Even if the animal bred for bloodsport has been afforded a much better and longer quality of life than one that was bred for consumption ?
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,425
Location Location
I just don't get why anyone would POSSIBLY want to "run with the bulls." What on earth are you getting out of that?

Why would anyone want to bunjee-jump ? Or drive at 150mph ? Or steal Tanks KFC ?
Adrenaline. Fear. Danger. The rush, and the feeling of triumph and accomplishment after being in mortal danger.
 






ATFC Seagull

Aberystwyth Town FC
Jul 27, 2004
5,350
(North) Portslade
Says on the report that this particular bull escaped the main run and got into an area of spectators. So the man may not have been "taking part" as such.
 


Skint Gull

New member
Jul 27, 2003
2,980
Watchin the boats go by
I've just been chatting to a friend of mine from Pamplona and she wasn't aware of this till i told her at about 10am. The Bulls run at 8am, people will get drunk after but it's not the sort of thing done after an all day sesh, strong hangover from 4 days worth of drinking by this stage but that's about it.

I used to carry the same view that many on here do that it was inhumane but when i recently learned what Easy has just said to everyone I'm more accepting of it. Gonna try and head over next year and make my mind up for myself
 


Danny-Boy

Banned
Apr 21, 2009
5,579
The Coast
I thought this thread was be the weekly comment and update from Harty ?

I did start a previous thread about this 3 days ago. Only 15 people have ben killed since 1924 reportedly, which makes it less dangerous than going to watch a Grand Prix IMHO.

The bulls would die anyway...
 




It's much more dangerous in Lewes ...


p468208637-3.jpg


p862540318-3.jpg
 


keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,972
I can't see what's hypocritical. Something dying for entertainment is wrong, something dying for food if it's done humanely as possible is fine. It's like saying anyone who has a problem with parading enemy soldiers' corpses or torture but accepts the need for an Army is a hypocrite
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
I don't agree with breeding animals for blood sports at all.

Consumption - yes
Blood sports - no

Agreed. It's as simple as that for me. I can't agree with animals being killed for fun, full stop. Regardless of quality of life previous.

This is not an either/or as Easy 10 (who I almost ALWAYS agree with) seems to be putting it. Forget the killing to eat for a sec.

Killing an animal for fun IS wrong, agreed?

As soon as that is agreed, arguments about quality of life etc go completely out the window. They become a MOOt point, if you will.
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,023
About time bull running and bull fighting got stopped.

i see the objection to the bull fighting, but whats the problem with the bull run? shall we stop horse racing too?
 


Man of Harveys

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
18,880
Brighton, UK
I assume that people who are so vehement about animals dying for people's fun work up a similar head of steam about horse racing, for which animals are bred solely for purpose and then despatched without a second's thought as soon as they're no longer financially sustainable? I know, killing them prematurely isn't the main gist of the activity but that's certainly often the net effect of it if the creatures are unlucky ever to get injured.
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
I assume that people who are so vehement about animals dying for people's fun work up a similar head of steam about horse racing, for which animals are bred solely for purpose and then despatched without a second's thought as soon as they're no longer financially sustainable? I know, killing them prematurely isn't the main gist of the activity but that's certainly often the net effect of it if the creatures are unlucky ever to get injured.

Are they literally killed FOR FUN? No. Move on.

No one should ENJOY watching animals die. That's sick.
 




shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,224
Lewes
Just for the record, turns out it was a 27 year old Spaniard from Madrid and not a Brit as was originally thought.
 




Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,425
Location Location
Are they literally killed FOR FUN? No. Move on.

Well, what else are racehorses bred for ? OK, racehorses are not ceremonially killed in front of people to provide a spectacle, but ultimately their EXISTANCE is for our "fun", is it not ? Similarly greyhounds. Once they are past their usefulness as a racer, very few of them end up retiring to a loving family to live out the rest of their days. Yet I don't see the widespread condemnation for horseracing / greyhound racing as we do for bullfighting. And the only reason for that, really, is because we don't actually see the horse or greyhound being killed in the end.

Ultimately, it all amounts to the same thing though, dunnit ?
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here