Brighton is the hub for European Chemtrails!

[Manx Shearwater]

Yes it does, in many ways.

Do you want to back that up with anything or are you going to treat it in the same way your videos do with regards to supporting evidence.

And remember, I want to know the MANY ways it makes you the winner, not just one.

 

[beorhthelm]

I CLAIM that this evidence might be true looking at the clues and the everyday corruption performed by our governments.
Do yo know much about corruption?
Did yu know during both world wars Oil was sold to both sides from the Rockerfella family who are americans. Doesn't that sound a little corrupt? if you think it does then dosen't that raise an eyebrow toward Governments hidden agendas?

again, with why do you distract off onto another irrelevent subject? stick to your chemtrail subject. you believe on the basis of the video that Brighton or rather Shorham airport is the HQ for european chemtrailing. despite the fact that anyone here can tell you that there are no silos and no capacity to run large aircraft from there? why do you believe so blindly?

 

[Joey Deacon's Disco Suit]

I CLAIM that this evidence might be true looking at the clues and the everyday corruption performed by our governments.
Do yo know much about corruption?
Did yu know during both world wars Oil was sold to both sides from the Rockerfella family who are americans. Doesn't that sound a little corrupt? if you think it does then dosen't that raise an eyebrow toward Governments hidden agendas?

Leaving aside the fact that for parts of both wars America was neutral are you seriously arguing that because an American company sold oil to allied and axis powers nearly 70 years ago that this proves that the current UK government is corrupt? I think that's the sound of barrels being scraped if that's the best you can come up with.

 

[The Large One]

Bullshit, you've been stalking me for months and now your coming up with this crap. what drugs have you been taking you fruit cake?

I don't 'stalk' anyone.

I also know how to have a reasoned debate. There is no 'teaming up'. If you could behave responsibly and not answer any challenge with obnoxious abuse, we might all get somewhere. The reason that there is so little debate is that everyone who knows how to have a debate (the vast majority) is waiting for you to be a little less abusive and obnoxious every time you're challenged. Once you've done that, we can have a reasoned debate.

I don't think that's too much to ask.

So, please, for the fourth time - what evidence is your certainty that 'chemtrails' affect the world's weather based upon?

 

[Falmer]

again, with why do you distract off onto another irrelevent subject? stick to your chemtrail subject. you believe on the basis of the video that Brighton or rather Shorham airport is the HQ for european chemtrailing. despite the fact that anyone here can tell you that there are no silos and no capacity to run large aircraft from there? why do you believe so blindly?

Clutching onto straws now aren't you! This thread is based on Government corruption, what I just mentioned is Government corruption regardless wether it has anything to do with Shoreham airport. My point if you could read was if you belive one corruption story then why can't you be open minded towards them all. As I've stated more than once on this thread, i think it might be true becuase I believe in previous corruption.

 

[Manx Shearwater]

Clutching onto straws now aren't you! This thread is based on Government corruption, what I just mentioned is Government corruption regardless wether it has anything to do with Shoreham airport. My point if you could read was if you belive one corruption story then why can't you be open minded towards them all. As I've stated more than once on this thread, i think it might be true becuase I believe in previous corruption.

Again, the 'you're not open minded' point.

We ARE being open minded. We'd love nothing more than for you to present some credible evidence to back up your points so we can make a reasoned decision on whether we believe these theories or not. Your lack of supporting evidence means that most of us are choosing to make a free will decision that we don't believe them. This is our perogative as much as it is yours to believe they are true. If you can come up with credible evidence, I for one, would be happy to change my mind.

That isn't being closed-minded.

 

[Falmer]

I don't 'stalk' anyone.

OH PLEASE! Go through all my threads over the last 5 months and notice how many of my threads you been on? then notice how many times you've posted on them. Also notice the length of time you spend on my threads manily trying to be funny in making me look stupid. Now you've seen through my threads, look at yours and notice how many times I bother you? never! Most of my threads and post have you as my first response! Please go through mine and your threads to see for yourself!

 

[Falmer]

Again, the 'you're not open minded' point.

We ARE being open minded. We'd love nothing more than for you to present some credible evidence to back up your points so we can make a reasoned decision on whether we believe these theories or not. Your lack of supporting evidence means that most of us are choosing to make a free will decision that we don't believe them. This is our perogative as much as it is yours to believe they are true. If you can come up with credible evidence, I for one, would be happy to change my mind.

That isn't being closed-minded.

My point if you could read was if you belive one corruption story then why can't you be open minded towards them all?. How is that stating your close-minded? I'm stating I believe in previous corruption conspiracy stories which means I find it very hard to not consider them all. Why take that so personally?

 

[Phoenix Arrow]

I don't 'stalk' anyone.

My ex girlfriend used to say that when I asked her why she was stalking me. I had to follow her to prove she was. She found and dumped me because I was right and she couldn't handle it.

By the way, I believe in freedom of speech above all else. If you really do believe in all this chemtrail business, then go ahead. But don't make a thread about it on a forum and then bleed out your unmentionables when someone disagrees with you or wants to ask you why you believe what you believe. If you respect other peoples opinions, they'll respect yours.

 

[WATFORD zero]

Must be

 

[beorhthelm]

Clutching onto straws now aren't you! This thread is based on Government corruption, what I just mentioned is Government corruption regardless wether it has anything to do with Shoreham airport. My point if you could read was if you belive one corruption story then why can't you be open minded towards them all. As I've stated more than once on this thread, i think it might be true becuase I believe in previous corruption.

im clutching at straws? you're thread is titled "Brighton is the hub for European Chemtrails! " with a couple of youtube vids about chemtrails, one claiming thet Shoreham airport is the euro HQ for this. this thread is about chemtrails, nothing, absolutly nothing is said about corruption. it must be difficult i know to keep track of so many conflicting thoughts and theories, but at least keep track of your own subject. and you still evade the simple question.

 

[Manx Shearwater]

My point if you could read was if you belive one corruption story then why can't you be open minded towards them all?. How is that stating your close-minded? I'm stating I believe in previous corruption conspiracy stories which means I find it very hard to not consider them all. Why take that so personally?

I didn't. I was making a general point. Which you missed completely.

 

[Falmer]

I didn't. I was making a general point. Which you missed completely.

Ans again that makes no sense as it's you asking me the questions!?

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

 

[Manx Shearwater]

Ans again that makes no sense as it's you asking me the questions!?

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

In a reasoned debate we can both ask questions, surely?

OK, so let's go back to the issues. So far my questions which you've not addressed so far in this thread include:

1. Has anyone carried out any independent analysis on the chemical content of these chem trails, and if so, what method did they use and what did they find?
2. Are there any corroborations between data relating to average life expectancy and mortality rates (and in particular Sussex, if Shoreham is the hub) that support the theory that these chem trails are used to control population numbers?
3. How come you 'won' on many levels in that previous exchange? (OK, I'm joking about number 3!! Do you want to discuss 1 and 2 at all, in a reasoned debate style?)

 

[Falmer]

In a reasoned debate we can both ask questions, surely?

OK, so let's go back to the issues. So far my questions which you've not addressed so far in this thread include:

1. Has anyone carried out any independent analysis on the chemical content of these chem trails, and if so, what method did they use and what did they find?
2. Are there any corroborations between data relating to average life expectancy and mortality rates (and in particular Sussex, if Shoreham is the hub) that support the theory that these chem trails are used to control population numbers?
3. How come you 'won' on many levels in that previous exchange? (OK, I'm joking about number 3!! Do you want to discuss 1 and 2 at all, in a reasoned debate style?)

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

 

[Bozza]

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

You, sir, are a complete mentalist and I claim my £5.

 

[Manx Shearwater]

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

So you don't want a reasoned debate at all?

 

[The Large One]

OH PLEASE! Go through all my threads over the last 5 months and notice how many of my threads you been on? then notice how many times you've posted on them. Also notice the length of time you spend on my threads manily trying to be funny in making me look stupid. Now you've seen through my threads, look at yours and notice how many times I bother you? never! Most of my threads and post have you as my first response! Please go through mine and your threads to see for yourself!

To satisfy your lust for glory...

You've started 12 threads since last mid-July. I've posted on three of them. I've been the first respondent on one of them, and that was admittedly a mildly flippant one which the vast majority who don't take themselves too brain-fryingly seriously would have laughed off or ignored. Out of 916 replies on those dozen threads, I've posted 49 times (this is the 50th). Those are hard facts, not beliefs. Hardly 'stalking', is it?

So I'm sorry to piss on your chips sweet cheeks, but believe me when I say you're not that important to me. However, seeing as you've convinced yourself that I think you are that important, here goes again - what evidence is your certainty that 'chemtrails' affect the world's weather based upon?

 

[Falmer]

To satisfy your lust for glory...

You've started 12 threads since last mid-July. I've posted on three of them. I've been the first respondent on one of them, and that was admittedly a mildly flippant one which the vast majority who don't take themselves too brain-fryingly seriously would have laughed off or ignored. Out of 916 replies on those dozen threads, I've posted 49 times (this is the 50th). Those are hard facts, not beliefs. Hardly 'stalking', is it?



So I'm sorry to piss on your chips sweet cheeks, but believe me when I say you're not that important to me. However, seeing as you've convinced yourself that I think you are that important, here goes again - what evidence is your certainty that 'chemtrails' affect the world's weather based upon?

Look this is well boring and sad. Fancy giving up on me and trying something else? I just want to talk about the issues, not answer childish questions like 'Prove it' when its a bloody conspiracy theory!

 

[Falmer]

You, sir, are a complete mentalist and I claim my £5.

why?