Lindfield by the Pond
Well-known member
Approx 26 miles taking a height of 138m
Anyway you can play with this! https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=NaN&h0=138&unit=metric
Nice one. Anyone saying 40 miles is talking bollocks then
Approx 26 miles taking a height of 138m
Anyway you can play with this! https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=NaN&h0=138&unit=metric
Nice one. Anyone saying 40 miles is talking bollocks then
Nevertheless, the Marina's 40-storey tower (at well over 400 feet) will indeed feature a rooftop observation deck, open to the public.If I wanted a marvellous view of anything, it wouldn't be Whitehawk.
No point in putting a 400ft pole next to a 400ft hill, cutting off view to the north.
The overall design of the i360 brings its own, intractable problem. While the curvy glass pod is actually quite attractive, it is relatively tiny: all that will be visible most of the time is an empty, ugly, grey pole that’s completely out of kilter with its surroundings. Looming over the seafront like some grotesque factory chimney, it speaks not of beauty, and pleasure, but of brutalism and lack of imagination.
Describing it as a vertical pier is laughable. A pier offers entertainment and pleasure, with fresh experiences to be discovered on every return visit. It’s hard to imagine people making repeated visits to the one-trick pony that is the i360.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m certainly no opponent of tall buildings per se. The CN Tower in Toronto, Seattle’s Space Needle and the Shard (to name but three) are all iconic structures that combine grace with stunning design. They invite wonderment, as well as endless photography.
Perhaps its location is half of the problem. The new 40-storey tower that is being constructed at the Marina, with its seductive, curved-edge design, will provide a stunning marker for the eastern end of our city. Perhaps the i360 would have been better placed here.
I fully accept that some people will find pleasure in gazing down on 180° of sea, plus another 180° of roofs. But somehow, it looks like our city’s planners have missed an opportunity to do something far, far better.
The overall design of the i360 brings its own, intractable problem. While the curvy glass pod is actually quite attractive, it is relatively tiny: all that will be visible most of the time is an empty, ugly, grey pole that’s completely out of kilter with its surroundings. Looming over the seafront like some grotesque factory chimney, it speaks not of beauty, and pleasure, but of brutalism and lack of imagination.
Describing it as a vertical pier is laughable. A pier offers entertainment and pleasure, with fresh experiences to be discovered on every return visit. It’s hard to imagine people making repeated visits to the one-trick pony that is the i360.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m certainly no opponent of tall buildings per se. The CN Tower in Toronto, Seattle’s Space Needle and the Shard (to name but three) are all iconic structures that combine grace with stunning design. They invite wonderment, as well as endless photography.
Perhaps its location is half of the problem. The new 40-storey tower that is being constructed at the Marina, with its seductive, curved-edge design, will provide a stunning marker for the eastern end of our city. Perhaps the i360 would have been better placed here.
I fully accept that some people will find pleasure in gazing down on 180° of sea, plus another 180° of roofs. But somehow, it looks like our city’s planners have missed an opportunity to do something far, far better.
Nice one. Anyone saying 40 miles is talking bollocks then
On reflection:
I'm not sure that tool that I linked to is the proper way to measure, because the Isle of Wight must be more than 40 miles away!
You don't have to queue at the bar on the i360 either.Take a walk on the Downs, the views are better, you can see much more, it's free, you get some exercise, you can experience something for yourself rather than experiencing someone else's vision while lining their pockets. And you don't have to queue at a bar with your back to the scenery.
The ride hasn't started yet, they're on the ground.There's two blokes in that picture watching telly FFS!
You don't have to queue at the bar on the i360 either.
The ride hasn't started yet, they're on the ground.
Yes they are, but they don't have to get a drink. You were comparing it to the lack of drinks queues on the downs - presumably that's because people aren't getting a drink on the downs?I'll give you the second point but there are definitely people queuing / waiting to be served in the other pic.
Yes they are, but they don't have to get a drink. You were comparing it to the lack of drinks queues on the downs - presumably that's because people aren't getting a dyou'll on the downs?
Although it looks like there's space for 200 people, I don't imagine there's space for 200 people to look out the side, which I'd have thought is that main point.