A political flag with a Brighton badge on it? BOLLOCKS.
As for the rest of it, I don't think you've got the hang of this 'politics' thing, have you?
To be fair, I don't think he's got the idea of this 'coherent English sentence' thing either.
A political flag with a Brighton badge on it? BOLLOCKS.
As for the rest of it, I don't think you've got the hang of this 'politics' thing, have you?
Who said the edl were reasonble I was making the assumptio that the boys in the picture were Do you know diferent then ? No you dont do you you know f*** all about them Except the fact that they are prepared to give up their free time for something that they believe in I bet theres no one who has posted on this thread that go's along to protest against them Like i said if you feel so strongly about it Go and tell them instead of hiding behind your keyboard
Is there a slight chance I could be on the card ?Only a couple more posters needed on my NSC anti-muslim bingo card. Don't let me down boys!
Good for you a man that stands up for what he believes in Well done Did you where your brighton shirtI have been on an anti EDL march in Manchester, and so has my son.
It might be an idea to make sure, on a post describing another as illiterate, to make sure there are no mistakes on your own.Quite simply, that is the most illiterate post I've ever read on here. And well done, I think that's probably the first time anybody Has ever described the EDL as "reasonable", although personally I prefer bigotTed and ignorant.
Does this count?As far as i know none of the edl members have committed murder Or any ilegal acts Yet
Good for you a man that stands up for what he believes in Well done Did you where your brighton shirt
Good response, this thread should now be closed
Small Sharia courts have been established according to this old article. Revealed: UKs first official sharia courts -Times Online
That's really really interesting.They've got a long way to go before they catch up with the Church of England.
In the Church of England, the Ecclesiastical Courts are a system of courts, held by authority of the Crown, whose wearer is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The courts have jurisdiction over matters dealing with the rights and obligations of church members, now limited to controversies in areas of church property and ecclesiastical disciplinary proceedings. In England these courts, unlike common law courts, are based upon and operate along civil law procedures and Canon law-based jurisprudence.
Offences against ecclesiastical laws are dealt with differently based on whether the laws in question involve church doctrine. For non-doctrinal cases, the lowest level of the court is the Archdeaconry Court, which is presided over by the local Archdeacon. The next court in the hierarchy is the Bishop's Court, which is in the archdiocese of Canterbury called the Commissary Court and in other dioceses the Consistory Court. The Commissary Court is presided over by a commissary-general; a Consistory Court is presided over by a chancellor. The chancellor or commissiary-general must be thirty years old and either have a seven-year general qualification under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 s 71 or have held high judicial office.
Specialist courts in the Province of Canterbury are the Court of Faculties, the Court of Peculiars and the Court of the Vicar-General of the Province of Canterbury. In the northern province there is the Court of the Vicar-General of the Province of York.
The next court is the Archbishop's Court, which is in Canterbury called the Arches Court, and in York the Chancery Court. Each court includes five judges; one judge is common to both courts. The common judge is called the Dean of Arches in Canterbury and the Auditor in York; he or she is appointed jointly by both Archbishops with the approval of the Crown, and must either hold a ten-year High Court qualification under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s 71, or have held high judicial office. Two members of each court must be clergy appointed by the Prolocutor of the Lower House of the provincial Convocation.[1] Two further members of each court are appointed by the Chairman of the House of Laity of the General Synod;[2] these must possess such legal qualifications as the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain requires.
In cases involving church doctrine, ceremony or ritual, the aforementioned courts have no jurisdiction. Instead, the Court of Ecclesiastical Causes Reserved hears the case. The Court is composed of three diocesan bishops and two appellate judges; it has jurisdiction over both of the provinces of Canterbury and York. The Court, however, meets very rarely.
Appeal from the Arches Court and Chancery Court (in non-doctrinal cases) lies to the Queen-in-Council. In practice, the case is heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which includes present and former Lords Chancellor, a number of Lords of Appeal and other high judicial officers. The Queen-in-Council does not have jurisdiction over doctrinal cases from the Court of Ecclesiastical Causes Reserved, which instead go to an ad hoc Commission of Review, composed of two diocesan Bishops and three Lords of Appeal (who are also members of the Judicial Committee).
Commissions of Convocation are appointed by the Upper House of the Convocation of Canterbury or of York to try a bishop for an offence (except for an offence of doctrine). Both Convocations make the appointment if an Archbishop is prosecuted. This would comprise four diocesan bishops and the Dean of the Arches.
I have been on an anti EDL march in Manchester, and so has my son.
İbrahim Tatlıses;3955824 said:Politics has no place in football, but racist rally groups certainly don't.
Club should sue/ban them.
No, No ,No not our El Pres, i always envisage him more as Morris Day sexual pervert , described in wikipedia as "Morris Day: Sexual Pervert. A bespectacled, jumper-wearing middle-aged man who is obsessed with pornography, ignoring his attractive wife who waits for him in their bedroom"i bet your like that character in Vis, modern parents.
And this is the bit I still don't get . Why our flag ? Or in particular , why our club badge ?? If they or anybody want to be identifed by being from Brighton , they've already done that by adding the word 'Brighton' in one of the corners . Our proud Seagull almost looks sad and embarressed .
Flags mean many things to many people , that's why it has always been a rallying cry to so many people and why a certain little Bavarian made up his own little red, black and white number in the 1930's. I get that. But our flag , our badge uniquely represents all supporters of BHA. Our support base spans the entire spectrum of age ,colour , profession and politics. We are all very different , but every week we unite under that one badge for the common cause . And that's football !! And our identity within football is that badge. That's it pure and simple.
If anybody wants to use that flag for anything else other than football, then you are free do so , but please remember to remove the badge first.
I 'hankyou
i bet your like that character in Vis, modern parents.
Does this count?
"
No, No ,No not our El Pres, i always envisage him more as Morris Day sexual pervert , described in wikipedia as "Morris Day: Sexual Pervert. A bespectacled, jumper-wearing middle-aged man who is obsessed with pornography, ignoring his attractive wife who waits for him in their bedroom"
EP'S politics may stink, but as far as i know , he's not a humourless beardy tosser like malcolm of malcolm and cressida in the modern parents !
Good for you a man that stands up for what he believes in Well done Did you where your brighton shirt
Seeing as many people at the far smaller UAF demo would have been Labour supporters does this?
Leading Labour councillor quizzed by police over grooming child for sex
Tom Harper and Justin Davenport
London Evening Standard31 Jan 2011
A Labour councillor with links to two members of the shadow cabinet has been arrested on suspicion of grooming a child for sex.