Your average cat has no objection in principle to the ripping to pieces of live animals. It probably does have an objection in practice to being on the receiving end.
Two sentences that perfectly sum up everything anyone needs to know about cats!
Your average cat has no objection in principle to the ripping to pieces of live animals. It probably does have an objection in practice to being on the receiving end.
Plenty of fines, regulations and laws to deal with those others actions these days and they are increasing.
Cat owners are the only ones who really pay no price for their destruction. Compare how a dog is treated in law compared to a cat.
Down here in NZ we have a high profile Economist who want's to carry out cat genocide.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/morgan-calls-for-cats-to-be-wiped-out/UAXKPC5JIRQLPK5NPE2SEK7LHE/
It is likely to happen in the future.
Cats are extremely bad for the environment, both directly and indirectly, but also for any local wildlife.
Essentially, cats are not needed, they are extremely expendable at a time where we need to save the planet and support our wildlife.
I wouldn't describe it as "genocide" - more of a cull. But carrying that out would be extreme and too distressing to cat owners. I would make it law to have all male cats neutered and phase them out by 2030 - any cats after that require a license.
It's not their fault they are cats - and it's not cat owners' fault that they grow to love their cats - but at the same time, we need to aim to get rid of them in the most humane way possible.
Domestic cats live far longer than feral ones and most owners will let them out when they want too. Hardly a cruel life for them lolI predict that it will happen, when humanity truly comes of age. Like you say, there are alternatives to cat ownership to assist with human mental health that isn't so destructive to wildlife, and/or with less of a carbon footprint.
The problem with cats is that whether you keep one as a house cat, which imo is cruel, or whether you let one roam outside, which is destructive, ownership can never be justified as there are alternatives. Perhaps dog ownership should be reduced too for the same reasons, but dogs are different as they are expected to be controlled at all times - for example if they attack or shit in public or private spaces the owner can be prosecuted, in addition to that they are more emotionally related to human beings, with the ability to be trained and to work.
Humans might be the problem, but there is no solution to that, because humans make the rules and we value human life above any other, rightly or wrongly. The best we can do is make the best moral decisions to protect all wildlife and our planet, and that will require reducing the populations of cats and other domestic animals, including livestock.
It's not their fault they are cats - and it's not cat owners' fault that they grow to love their cats - but at the same time, we need to aim to get rid of them in the most humane way possible.
Humanity and all life on earth - 400 million cats on earth is too many. That's 124 million tonnes of extra carbon in the atmosphere per year and many billions of unnecessary deaths of birds and other mammals, including extinctions of species.
They are one of the most destructive pests that life on earth has ever encountered.
edit: Although all of a sudden I remembered I am posting this on a thread about a cat murderer... I love cats as individual animals, it's not their fault. Would like to reiterate that anyone who harms a cat or any animal is a likely a psychopath who needs to be locked up! There are ways the powers that be should be phasing them out humanely through drastically reducing their reproducing.
Humanity and all life on earth - 400 million cats on earth is too many. That's 124 million tonnes of extra carbon in the atmosphere per year and many billions of unnecessary deaths of birds and other mammals, including extinctions of species.
They are one of the most destructive pests that life on earth has ever encountered.
edit: Although all of a sudden I remembered I am posting this on a thread about a cat murderer... I love cats as individual animals, it's not their fault. Would like to reiterate that anyone who harms a cat or any animal is a likely a psychopath who needs to be locked up! There are ways the powers that be should be phasing them out humanely through drastically reducing their reproducing.
You see, the intriguing thing is that Tyrone hasn't done any of the things he says. He is being "shocking". Adding value to the thread by pretending to be a mustache twirling villain.
But why is he doing this? That's a fascinating study in online behaviour. Why do people behave in ways and tell silly lies they would never do in their normal, safe lives?
A lot of it comes down to loneliness and attention seeking. Being a decent sort of chap with a normal steady job, perhaps a partner and even children, isn't a magnet for attention. People simply aren't taking enough notice.
So, like say, Tommy Boyd or Piers Morgan, he has worked out that you can get that quick adrenaline rush by saying something cartoonishly controversial. Savour those replies, and indignation, then go back to your normal life without repercussions.
It's truly remarkable.
a pretty hard mate of mine was hospitalised by a feral cat .......it was attacking his cat , basically had it by the neck and was choking it out against the ground , he grabbed hold of it by the scruff and tried to pull it off , the ****er let go of his cat and went to town on him...both hands , chest , face and the top of his head ....about 60 stitches and 2 night on an iv drip in hospital......cants of things mate , they look like little tigers and they go off like 'em as well.
he's a Wolves fan so i/we had a good laugh about it ......" here kitty kitty " in a dopey yam yam accent really wound him up for months....
And that's why you head shot them.
Avoids any chance of getting wrecked by one.
"People consider cats to be a member of the family. So he's trying to, quite frankly, take away the civil liberties we all have to choose who we want in our home."
if people can reasign their own gender surely they are entitled to own a cat...
The former comes well within the realms of being treated with diginity and respect I would suggest. A human right under the UN charter I believe.
The second?...... First world problems I'm afraid.
The former comes well within the realms of being treated with diginity and respect I would suggest. A human right under the UN charter I believe.
The second?...... First world problems I'm afraid.
A bunch of 40 and 50 something men turn a thread about cat killing into a petty, juvenile squabble. Is no topic safe from a binfest?
Plenty of fines, regulations and laws to deal with those others actions these days and they are increasing.
Cat owners are the only ones who really pay no price for their destruction. Compare how a dog is treated in law compared to a cat.