Why has this thread gone off track?
Why not? Best place for it really....................
Why has this thread gone off track?
Why has this thread gone off track?
Partly because of the example you gave. Why do poorer parents have to sacrifice their lives almost to put their children on a level playing field with others? Does that not sound wrong to you? .
What about parents who work damn hard and contribute greatly to society who want the absolute best for their kids but simply can't afford to? Should those kids just be left to have a lower standard than the rich kids?
Ban private schools and invest in getting every child the best possible education regardless of their background. If we do that we may start to see some social mobility and better representation of people in top jobs and government.
Both higher and non-higher educated people are critical to make a country function. One is not better than the other. But both should have the education they require for free.
Why has this thread gone off track?
Why has this thread gone off track?
Yes. Raise them all to the same level, I have said that.
.
Now - if you would like to discus completely free university education for professional qualifications such as Science, Maths, Engineering, Law, Medicine etc. - about 16% - as it used to be , not the 50% now - well - that would be a great conversation!
I disagree. Education is not necessarily university. After 18 firms should pay for further training, as in the case of my other half who is a qualified mechanical engineer, but now so much electronics is needed, his firm paid for him to take his HND in electronic engineering.
Companies are moaning the workers don't have the skill sets but won't pay for the training.
You go on to mention the same basic resources, which is what education up to the age of 18 comprises.
University education is not for the masses.
I was on holiday in France when a couple of coaches pulled into the camp site full of dancers aged between 11 and 15. In Russia, you are separated at 11 depending on your skills. These were all good dancers, so their school taught the usual state education up to noon, and then after lunch, it was all dance training. It was fascinating talking to their teachers.
Engineers would go to an engineering school, linguists to a language school, gymnasts to a gymnastic school etc etc.
Because whenever you get asked an 'on track' question you run away
Are you up for giving it a go?
Alright Dave?Ok, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal, what happens next?
I don't run away. I voted leave and that's what I want.
Again.Simply not true
I havnt apportioned any blame on cheap foreign labour to kids dropping out of working in the factory in the firm mentioned by Thunder Bolt or dropping out of working in any factory for that matter.
You can keep repeating it, but how about providing a quote next time, which you seem to be unable to do.
)
But surely it isn't just their problem given that a very large proportion of EU27 imports to Britain are goods essential to our physical and economic wellbeing - engines for vehicles being assembled here for example. Supply chains would quickly snap if they were marooned in Calais?.
I am trying to be helpful here. People say that Brexiteers aren't considering the consequences of 'No Deal'. It is hard to believe that this can be true, so I am asking one of their number to explain what the consequences are. I asked if you thought we could speed things up at the ports by abolishing tariffs on EU goods. Is that something you favour?
Alright Dave?
I disagree. Education is not necessarily university. After 18 firms should pay for further training, as in the case of my other half who is a qualified mechanical engineer, but now so much electronics is needed, his firm paid for him to take his HND in electronic engineering.
Companies are moaning the workers don't have the skill sets but won't pay for the training.
You go on to mention the same basic resources, which is what education up to the age of 18 comprises.
University education is not for the masses.
I was on holiday in France when a couple of coaches pulled into the camp site full of dancers aged between 11 and 15. In Russia, you are separated at 11 depending on your skills. These were all good dancers, so their school taught the usual state education up to noon, and then after lunch, it was all dance training. It was fascinating talking to their teachers.
Engineers would go to an engineering school, linguists to a language school, gymnasts to a gymnastic school etc etc.
That actually sounds good. The only downside is children change their minds quite frequently. One day a doctor the next a policeman.
Again.Simply not true
I havnt apportioned any blame on cheap foreign labour to kids dropping out of working in the factory in the firm mentioned by Thunder Bolt or dropping out of working in any factory for that matter.
You can keep repeating it, but how about providing a quote next time, which you seem to be unable to do.
Got to snigger [MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION] giving you a thumbs up on what i have apparently been saying, not bad for someone who claims he has me on ignore and doesnt read what i am saying anyway.
What a (hats are back in stock)
We spend around 4.7% of GDP on education - the same as the EU average. That isn't pathetic. Free education up to the age of 18 for everyone. Once again not pathetic. Everyone can go to uni ( results depending ) - once again not pathetic. You appear to have a very large chip on your shoulder. I can only assume you didn't get any GCSE's or A levels and didn't bother to go to Uni.
Obviously you don't need to push as many people through as possible. The whole higher education stats padding is what led to this mess.
And mechanics like you mention should get access to free training and education as well. They are just as important!