Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
If Brexit does need to be ratified in parliament it will make things very interesting, particularly for those MPs whose constituencies views differ from their own. It wouldn't seem feasible for May to get a majority but plenty of MPs will be scared of losing their seat.
I agree with you - this is such an interesting situation, and one that PPE students will be discussing for years. In theory it comes down to the question of how you define a representative parliament.
Some argue that parliamentarians are simply there to implement the views of the people. The alternative view is Burke's - "Parliament is a deliberative assembly of one nation, with one interest, that of the whole… You choose a member, indeed; but when you have chosen him he is not a member of Bristol, but he is a member of Parliament".
Almost everyone seems to agree that Burke's definition is the only one that will work, but with a sort of common sense caveat. The caveat is that, when considering what actions are in their view best for the nation, representatives must also "take note" of the will of the people. That's where the fights start. Many debates in parliament involve the conflicts that arise between what some see as the "will of the people" on the one hand and what others see as the "interests of the whole nation" on the other. These conflicts used to be fought mainly against the battleground of the rights of the common man. More recently, the issues have been more populist, and fought out on tabloid pages.
Even allowing for opinion polls we rarely know what the 'will of the people' is - but we do on this occasion - it appears to be that 17m people want us to leave the EU. However, most MPs believe that 'the interests of the nation' are served by the opposite. Here comes the conflct. If Burke's 200-year-old principles are going to apply, parliament will simply ignore the referendum result. MPs won't do that, but given their starting point ("we shouldn't leave the EU") it is reasonable to assume that in their view the next best thing 'for the nation' is leaving as lightly as possible - in other words, soft Brexit. That is where the fight has now reached.
If the conflict reaches parliament I doubt that sufficient numbers of MPs would fight for what they apparently see as being in the nation's interest. Whether that's because they have just changed their mind or because they have mortgages to pay and careers to build or because they believe in the glorious principles of true democracy probably depends on if you are a remainer or a leaver.