Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,099






Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,953
Brighton
I was at cricket on Friday with a bunch of guys that included three City traders. They were obviously keeping half an eye on goings on re public reaction and the markets. One reported that the biggest Google search of the day had been "what happens if you leave the EU?". This was Friday. the day AFTER the election. Hmmm.

Yeah, I heard this, but took it with a prince of salt as well. It could be a common entry to find a much visited page to revisit some information. But you're right, too many people were uninformed and voted on feeling rather than insight.

What did the City boys say about what will happen next? We'll have this market silliness for a few weeks I think and then it will settle, but the issue will be that growth and tax receipts will just be depressed long-term. We'll have to borrow more to invest. My view.


Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(
 


SK1NT

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2003
8,762
Thames Ditton
To be accused of being 'racist' and 'stupid' because I'd rather we weren't dictated to by a bunch of unelected, unaccountable, random people is odd and rather amusing.

For the record, I'm one of the 36% of 18-24's that bothered to go and vote and I'm delighted with the outcome.

How do you feel about the next prime minister being unelected?
 


SK1NT

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2003
8,762
Thames Ditton
People in this country have had enough of experts....................

lol but they all turned to Mark Carney for guidance when the Sterling plummeted on Fri and yet before the referendum brexiters were sold the lie that he couldn't be trusted and we don't need experts.
 


c0lz

North East Stand.
Jan 26, 2010
2,203
Patcham/Brighton
We were one of the big 3. Nothing actually happened without the UK, Germany and France being in on it.

What influence did we have? Are you only just asking this question now?

Just because legislation was enacted that we did not like, it did not mean that it wasn't in the interests of the bloc as a whole. FFS :ffsparr:

People are asking basic questions that they should have throughly researched before putting pencil to paper.

On 72 occasions in the Council of Ministers where the United Kingdom has opposed a particular measure. Of those 72 occasions, we had lost 72 times. One of the big 3 lol,
 








Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,341
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Yeah, I heard this, but took it with a prince of salt as well. It could be a common entry to find a much visited page to revisit some information. But you're right, too many people were uninformed and voted on feeling rather than insight.

What did the City boys say about what will happen next? We'll have this market silliness for a few weeks I think and then it will settle, but the issue will be that growth and tax receipts will just be depressed long-term. We'll have to borrow more to invest. My view.


Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(

There were mixed views. Everyone thought the initial stock market losses were too sharp (BA down 50% and Aviva 60% were highlights, much of it now recovered), that the pound wouldn't get back to anything like pre-referendum levels until there was stability in the political situation and that a Remain vote would obviously have been better for stability because we would all know where we are. Markets don't like unknowns and there are plenty of them still, though the actual direction of the vote will give some traders some confidence.
 




Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,953
Brighton
On 72 occasions in the Council of Ministers where the United Kingdom has opposed a particular measure. Of those 72 occasions, we had lost 72 times. One of the big 3 lol,

One of those misleading facts. We just don't know, because we don't have the data to determine whether we are always on the losing side. Although I thought Europe was supposed to winner.

What we do know, though, from official EU voting records is that the British government has voted ‘No’ to EU proposals on 56 occasions, abstained 70 times, and voted ‘Yes’ to legislative proposals 2,466 times since 1999. In other words, UK ministers were on the “winning side” 95% of the time, abstained 3% of the time, and were on the losing side 2%. Just pointing out how many times the UK government ‘lost’ is hence a misleading picture of what has happened.

And for balance, when the UK is outvoted on budgetary matters, as it has been several times, one could argue that this has implications for all EU taxpayers, but would affect how much each UK taxpayer paid into the EU budget only marginally.




Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Yeah, I heard this, but took it with a prince of salt as well. It could be a common entry to find a much visited page to revisit some information. But you're right, too many people were uninformed and voted on feeling rather than insight.

What did the City boys say about what will happen next? We'll have this market silliness for a few weeks I think and then it will settle, but the issue will be that growth and tax receipts will just be depressed long-term. We'll have to borrow more to invest. My view.


Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(

When you type those words, doesn't even a little bit of you feel it sounds elitist and patronising, just a tiny little bit of your inner better self .................. ???

If you crudely accept that people voting Leave were uniformed, why would you think if they hypothetically were suddenly informed that they would vote like you, are you saying every one of the 158 MP's that voted to Leave were uniformed and had no insight ??
 






Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,505
Vilamoura, Portugal
I've just seen, I'm hoping it calms down and we can see where it is going over the next few years.

If you look at the markets each day and try to draw conclusions you will oscillate between ecstasy and despair on a very regular basis. The only way forward is to take any short term movements with a pinch of salt, since they are partially driven by emotion and not fundamentals.
 


Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,953
Brighton
When you type those words, doesn't even a little bit of you feel it sounds elitist and patronising, just a tiny little bit of your inner better self .................. ???

If you crudely accept that people voting Leave were uniformed, why would you think if they hypothetically were suddenly informed that they would vote like you, are you saying every one of the 158 MP's that voted to Leave were uniformed and had no insight ??

No. I'm not being rude, I'm stating simple truths.

We live in a world where some people are very intelligent and some are not intelligent at all.

I agree we could debate the anti and pre-EU dogma which will sit on both sides. Many have entrenched views that are not open-minded.


Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,136
Goldstone
But she can't though; this is an area (under Treaty) of EU, not member state, competence (responsibility). For AM to do such a thing would cause a s***storm of enormous proportion in the other 26 member states directed both at her, and possibly the UK, for being complicit in something that could be deemed illegal.
It's not illegal for her to discuss things with us, it's not under treaty that she can't discuss things with us.
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,136
Goldstone
I would say that accusing the EU members of not doing a day’s work in their lives
It was just a cheeky piss take. You've seen him before, right?

He also challenged them with "the EU needs us more than we need the EU."
That's just him talking up our side. You don't go into negotiations talking up the other side do you, it's hardly offensive.

All those who voted Leave will be the first to complain when it hits their pockets and again on the Euro exchange rate on their Costa Del Sol holiday's.
I'm off to France tomorrow, I haven't complained.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,136
Goldstone
He insulted his fellow MEPs
They are always insulting each other though.
His claims that the EU would need the UK now more than we would need it were woefully wide of the mark.
As above, you talk up your side before a negotiation. To suggest that is unacceptable is ridiculous.

So I've asked for a list of things that he said that were unacceptable, and you've got the joke he said about MEPs (rude, but seriously, grow a pair) and that he said the EU need us. Wow.

For the record, I don't like Farage, I'd never vote for his scummy party, but I was expecting a lot worse when I clicked on the link.
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
No. I'm not being rude, I'm stating simple truths.

We live in a world where some people are very intelligent and some are not intelligent at all.

I agree we could debate the anti and pre-EU dogma which will sit on both sides. Many have entrenched views that are not open-minded.


Sent from my iPhone in a non-Calde world :-(

But by default your position is that Outers, including 158 declared MP's are unintelligent and uninformed, at least have humility to accept that some of the MP's have an insight to why they were campaigning and voting to leave the EU, many of them, if you deem it relevant have more knowledge than you or I.

Perhaps there comes a time in a referendum, that you are open minded but ultimately a decision must be forged and on balance you either stay with the status quo or you feel justified to think there are better opportunities outside of the EU, each side isnt really extreme or ignorant or one better than the other.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here