- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,950
Well traditionally all Governments of the last century have had thousands of highly paid, highly skilled experts on every imaginable area working in the Civil service who can advise them on what the implications would be with any of the things they want to do.It's a good plan, but the local council can't afford to fill the diggers with fuel, so digging the valley out has been put back until after the next election.
As for how, why and when, such questions are just noise to our leaders, forward-thinkers and paradigm-shifters. Tory MPs operate on a higher plane.
I reckon one of them comes up with these wizard ideas in closed meetings, and they all slap each other on the back in a show of appreciation before it is introduced to a wider audience, at which point, more worldly people ask 'WTF?', and produce a long list of hitherto unforeseen pitfalls. But then it's too late. They've already announced it and have to run with it, steadfastly defending it until it falls apart.
See pork markets. Nice trip to Beijing though.
See Rwanda. 120 million of taxpayers' money helping corruption in East Africa, instead of the new record 504,000 immigration figure.
See Liz Truss. 30 billion of taxpayers money up the creek, plus 115k pa for life for an ex-PM who lasted a full 7 weeks of torture. That's proper value for money, that is.
See Brexit. But we don't want to talk about that. Let's move on.
Unfortunately as you know, this lot then decided 'they had had enough of experts' around 2016, haven't looked back since and now, purely coincidentally I'm sure, we are up shit creek without a paddle. If only someone had said at the time
Last edited: