Who cares ?Surprise surprise ! It's a shit sandwich after all !
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...trayal-as-mps-fear-rush-to-ratify-brexit-deal
They all knew exactly what they voted for.
Who cares ?Surprise surprise ! It's a shit sandwich after all !
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...trayal-as-mps-fear-rush-to-ratify-brexit-deal
Surprise surprise ! It's a shit sandwich after all !
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...trayal-as-mps-fear-rush-to-ratify-brexit-deal
The Guardian, a rag close to my heart.
Is there anything in particular you like or dislike about the guardian?
Lets be serious for a while, the cost of brexit is estimated to be around 200bn, twice the cost of HS2, (and the same people argue HS2 should be scrapped cos we can't afford it).
It's a huge cost which we ALL have to pay either with more austerity or tax increases since there are no economic benefits to Brexit
[tweet]1342817444696649731[/tweet]
I guess for the (we) Remainer, there's a choice of 2 paths
a) that Brexit goes so badly that somehow we go back to the negotiating table and apply for re-entry; or
b) we accept that it was indeed (if not quite) the cock-up we predicted, but hope that somehow the damage is limited
Either of these are grim but I'd go for b). I'm not the sure that the country could go through this divisiveness again for a long while yet.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55460948
Well, this can’t be right. NSC was quite clear that food prices would rise post Brexit. I can’t believe it possible that unqualified people were just making stuff up to make their case sound better.
Indeed.I suspect most of these claims were made with regard to a no deal Brexit - in which case they were supported by Tesco. A related point was that in the early days of Brexit many of its supporters were making the claim that Brexit would result in lower food prices. There is no evidence to support this and indeed the article refutes it.
I guess you'd need to evaluate which claims were made on the basis of reasonable and credible analysis and which were knowingly falsely-made and intended to deceive.
The other variable is the effect of Brexit on the value of the pound - if it falls (as it did in a sustained fashion after 2016) then food prices rise..
Financial services were always intended to be in a separate agreement - although 'no deal' in the main trade agreement would have destroyed any goodwill to make the financial services arrangement.Although, I have to say, it is VERY worrying, that financial services are not as well covered within the trade agreement as we would have hoped. Which is a complete f**k up. They account for over £282bn for our economy, yet fishing is mentioned more in the deal, which equates a measly £180m towards the economy. Utter utter madness.
I just hope Richi can sort this out as he promised today. He's probably the only Tory I kind of trust.
PMSL, bring back Jo Swinson the peoples vote, Ian Blackford the **** with the megaphone and all the other jokers
Regards
DF
Indeed.
All the claims about food shortages or price rises were for if there was a "no deal" / WTO / "Australia ( sic ) deal" - which was being championed a lot.
Thankfully without the cause there is no effect.
As the blessed Sir Nigel of Farage said 'the war is over'
... hope you all realise this one day and bin your little EU flags moving on with your lives and enjoy the sunny uplands!
If you'd like to have the opportunity to make a valid contribution to this thread after your 4,000 entries, here is the agreement:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/draft_eu-uk_trade_and_cooperation_agreement.pdf
Look forward to your analysis.
Ppf is as likely to read it and give a considered unbiased opinion as anyone else on this thread. Overall Brexiteers appear generally happy as it gives us tariff and quota-free access for goods removing primacy of the ECJ (Canada ++) whereas the #teameu crew already knew it's rubbish but are just waiting for the Guardian and James O'Brien to tell them why.