No answer from you because you know I am right.
Tell me.... what are you right about?
No answer from you because you know I am right.
But it is the best deal possible, the tory goverent say it is, including Gove and Fox etc. The tory manifesto says we will leave with the best possible deal in a smooth and orderly fashion.
No where does it say that they want a no deal brexit.
These Tory MP's that are obstructing Brexit hoping for no deal aren't acting in accordance with those who voted them in to represent them in parliament.
Right I'm off to watch re-runs of good stuff on telly! Bye bye.
Serious question:
Would you accept a further ref with say 3 types of leave on the paper: Norway style deal; May’s deal; WTO?
Because that is possibly the best way to resolve the deadlock.
At least that referendum would technically be honouring the first result but I wouldn't support it because as everyone agreed before the vote there was only ever meant to be one. Plus the likely split in leave voter preferences while most remain voters would pile on the Norway option would make the whole process a foregone conclusion anyway.
Tell me.... what are you right about?
Ask Matt Hancock, the Health secretary.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/pol...-shortages-in-uk-crashes-out-of-a3990706.html
It takes at least two, maybe three votes to leave but only one to Remain... the new politics, yay.
But it is the best deal possible, the tory goverent say it is, including Gove and Fox etc. The tory manifesto says we will leave with the best possible deal in a smooth and orderly fashion.
No where does it say that they want a no deal brexit.
These Tory MP's that are obstructing Brexit hoping for no deal aren't acting in accordance with those who voted them in to represent them in parliament.
That doesn't say people ARE going to die.What mellotron says sounds like he actually wants people to die to say I told you so.Sounds vile to me.
View attachment 106924
The Government saying it doesn't make it true. How can it be the best deal if it can't get anywhere near a majority in parliament?
The Government saying it doesn't make it true.
The Government saying it doesn't make it true. How can it be the best deal if it can't get anywhere near a majority in parliament?
For someone who claims to be the 'Bringer of Truth' I would say that was subjective rather than objective. For instance, all I would want is one clear, informed, honest ratification (which we haven't had) - not necessarily another referendum.
That's my truth
But you wouldn't,... would you?
That's your truth
Wow. Think about that for a moment.