Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,099


Baldseagull

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2012
11,839
Crawley
Thats handy isnt it, after its alleged she wrote on facebook that she would shoot May she decides her facebook account has been hacked

https://order-order.com/2019/03/22/...ed-may-discussed-buy-legal-guns-take-commons/





Apparently it describes patriots

View attachment 106427




HKFC and LL Little angry man have just said the version of revoke they are thinking about is revoke and look at all the alternatives that comes with re-invoking later or even another vote NOT the revoke version where we stay in the EU and forget leaving completely. When did they become leavers? Perhaps all your WTO rubbish has confused you and fried your brain

Sounds like you are Gammon and proud Pasta.
 




el punal

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2012
12,545
The dull part of the south coast
What does it reveal?

Loads! One description is how completely diverse Americans are in world affairs and their attitudes to anything that ain’t the good ol’ U.S. of A. Some so unbelievably insular and ignorant of the world in general, and some very knowledgeable. Just that view alone mirrors the polarisation of American life under Trump. And, so much more.
 






clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,876
Well I went up to observe and wish I didn't because it took me an hour to walk up Whitehall on the way out.

Not quite what I suspected, no anti-capitalist protesters, no socialist workers, just hundreds of thousands of very ordinary English people of all ages.

I fully expected the National Trust to have a stand there.

Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Well I went up to observe and wish I didn't because it took me an hour to walk up Whitehall on the way out.

Not quite what I suspected, no anti-capitalist protesters, no socialist workers, just hundreds of thousands of very ordinary English people of all ages.

I fully expected the National Trust to have a stand there.

Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk

English people? There were Scots and Welsh there. Coaches from the Highlands and Islands.
 




Dick Head

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Jan 3, 2010
13,889
Quaxxann
She's got lovely legs.

This comment will seem very random when the thread is inevitably merged into the Brexit juggernaut thread.
 






Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Yeah Laura and katya. Very balanced and unbiased reporters. Not. BBC the balanced view? Yeah ok. Just think we're forced to pay for that too.

I never said they gave a balanced view and I couldn’t care less either way as I just take note of the events they are describing. Funny how some people say the BBC are too left wing and others too right wing. I just think viewers see what they want to see depending on their own bias.
 


clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,876
English people? There were Scots and Welsh there. Coaches from the Highlands and Islands.
Of course but most were English (I heard) and many elderly who had bothered.

My point being that there is clearly a sizeable , sensible and conservative with a small c group of people who are currently being ignored by our politicians.

Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
 




Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Loads! One description is how completely diverse Americans are in world affairs and their attitudes to anything that ain’t the good ol’ U.S. of A. Some so unbelievably insular and ignorant of the world in general, and some very knowledgeable. Just that view alone mirrors the polarisation of American life under Trump. And, so much more.
We sell some goods into the consumer market in the USA and they are so insular it’s hilarious. We had a customer e mail us to ask us what that funny sign was where the $ should have been next to a product price :laugh:
 


Albion Dan

Banned
Jul 8, 2003
11,125
Peckham
Another referendum would be catastrophic to democracy.

.

This makes no sense to me. What could be more democratic than letting the people decide now that they are fully informed what Brexit really means rather than the completely false version they were presented last time (easiest deal in history, £350m to the NHS etc etc)?
 


Two Professors

Two Mad Professors
Jul 13, 2009
7,617
Multicultural Brum
I know that specsavers have started doing hearing aids, but didn't realise they had added a cure for gross stupidity to their product range :wink:

hohoho,that was nail-bitingly funny.Did you manage to get something for your habit?They have this in the pharmacy section,next to Vision Express:

drip.png

Perhaps you should wear mittens,or get a dummy.
 










GrizzlingGammon

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
1,995
It would mean that all future referendums could be considered impermanent or ineffective, or pointless. This could extend to general elections. It was made perfectly clear to the electorate that the results of the Brexit referendum were final and to be implemented. Going back on that democratic promise would undermine democracy.

Besides, people are not fully informed what Brexit means, even now. In fact we know little more than we did in 2016. We do know that this government has made a disastrous effort in carrying out the Brexit negotiations, but nobody knows what Brexit is going to look like, or what kind of deal we will we get, if any.

But many of the Farage, Johnson, et al. lies have have been shown to be what they are.
 




Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
This makes no sense to me. What could be more democratic than letting the people decide now that they are fully informed what Brexit really means rather than the completely false version they were presented last time (easiest deal in history, £350m to the NHS etc etc)?

You are missing the point. You may think it’s democratic and you may be right but the majority of leavers probably won’t see it as democratic which is why it could be catastrophic
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here