JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
If you feel there's an equivalence between, on the one hand, Cameron suggesting that French officials might remove a concession that allows prospective immigrants to be interviewed by British border staff at the French end of the channel tunnel rather than the British one with, on the other, the relentless long term drone of anti-immigrant rhetoric and stone-cold lies from Leave campaigners then I guess I'm out of this conversation. I'll leave others to judge your even-handedness.
I try to answer questions put to me though. I can't at the moment find a relevant quote from Cummins although I have seen it mentioned often enough. I appreciate that this might set you off on another furious spate of veloxing but I have never come across a sentient being yet who says that the bus message wasn't effectively a lie - the important part of Cummins' comment on the subject of the bus side is that the message was essential to the Leave victory. You claim that it is patronising to suggest such a thing. The director of Vote Leave has his own view, comprehensively put in a piece in the Spectator in January 2017. It's fenced I'm afraid and I really don't want to take out another sub. Sorry.
Any sentient being can see that suggesting thousands of immigrants will be rocking up in Kent if we vote leave is playing on some peoples fears and prejudices. Especially when The Le Touquet border agreement, which covers the Calais border arrangements, was and is separate to our EU membership (as Cameron well knew). Funnily enough the UK and France have actually updated and strengthened the agreement last year .... despite Brexit. But never mind, you carry on trying to justify using fear of immigrants as a campaign tool, not at all hypocritical, no sireee.
No surprise you can't find any quote of Cummings saying 'it was the bus lie that won it' ... because you know he didn't say it. What he actually said (very easy to find for free) ...
'Pundits and MPs kept saying ‘why isn’t Leave arguing about the economy and living standards’. They did not realise that for millions of people, £350m/NHS was about the economy and living standards – that’s why it was so effective. It was clearly the most effective argument not only with the crucial swing fifth but with almost every demographic.
Even with UKIP voters it was level-pegging with immigration.
Would we have won without immigration? No.
Would we have won without £350m/NHS? All our research and the close result strongly suggests No.'
Amusing that you complain about the leave campaign misleading people when you continually, deliberately, misquote him suggesting he used the term lie. Reducing a series of nuanced views to a handy misleading quote that could fit on the side of a bus … how very vote leave.