[Politics] Brexit

[pastafarian]

https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7783

Umm that’s not the tweet, and I don’t dispute the figures

Im sure its perfectly true that of known NHS staff
British 87.3%
EU Nationals 5.6%
Non EU Nationals 7.1%

Tweet is still suspect though if its correct how it was described in the post

 

[Baker lite]

You really are a nasty piece of work aren't you, I hope you never suffer a dilibating illness or injury or have to survive on benefits, if you are a typical example of be brextremism it is no wonder you are vilified by some of the remain side. You disgust me.

Would you care to kiss my notcher?
X

 

[CHAPPERS]

[tweet]1074655623113891841[/tweet]

 

[Bwian]

# in denial
regards
DR

# in denial? No, I was addressing your error. A referendum is not legally binding no matter how many times you try polishing your Brexit turd.

 

[Is it PotG?]

A referendum is not legally binding no matter how many times you try polishing your Brexit turd.

Indeed, it is merely a democratic vote that all Parties agreed to uphold the result of.

 

[Baldseagull]

It wasn't, and won't. You can quote me on that when the reality unfolds.
Just as the £4,300 could have got the leave campaign to talk about that, and whether it was really £4,300 or a bit less.

Why would all these stupid people from council estates be so happy for extra money to be spent on the NHS, despite the fact that they'd be getting £4,300 less to spend themselves? They really are a selfless, generous bunch aren't they.

The figure comes from Treasury estimates of how much smaller the economy would be if we end up with a Canada style free trade agreement, as opposed to being members of the EU, the £4,300 per household is what a 6.2% smaller economy in 2030 equates to. It is wrong to suggest each and every household will be hit by £4,300, and it is a loaded way of presenting the figure, but it is what the average would be.
We will never be able to accurately say how much better or worse the other way would have been in comparison to what we actually end up doing, but it has been modelled, and the 6.2% is the middle of the range for the reduced growth predicted from a Canada style FTA.

 

[Gazwag]

On the train from Lewes to Falmer there was some double well 'ard, triple naughty, top boys from Chelsea. They were having a conversation about a game 'back in the day' in the 80's where someone got their throat slashed outside a pub - you'd have loved it. I couldn't quite catch all the details though.

And when he got to hospital he was treated by a British Doctor and a British Nurse

 

[Baldseagull]

Along with contributing on similar levels to us pro rata financially, that sounds fair enough.

This is almost what happens, everyone contributes based on their GDP per capita, except we get a rebate, so everyone else contributes more pro rata than we do.
Then there is where the contributions are spent, and the poorer regions are receiving more inputs than the wealthier parts like us, as you would expect.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Just when you think things couldn't get any worse, that pink-faced pig-f*cker Cameron - who landed us in this mess in the first place - feels emboldened enough to raise his ugly pink face. **** should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. ANY town.

 

[golddene]

Would you care to kiss my notcher?
X

NO thank you, though I'd quite like to impact your "notcher" with my knee, sunshine.

 

[Is it PotG?]

Just when you think things couldn't get any worse, that pink-faced pig-f*cker Cameron - who landed us in this mess in the first place - feels emboldened enough to raise his ugly pink face. **** should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. ANY town.

Maybe he and that nice Mr Blair can share a cab.

 

[Baker lite]

NO thank you, though I'd quite like to impact your "notcher" with my knee, sunshine.

Pervert..

 

[Baker lite]

BrExit - the countdown to 11PM GMT on Friday 29th of March 2019

Maybe he and that nice Mr Blair can share a cab.

I think we should have a second Chillcot enquiry, I wasn’t happy with last one..

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Just when you think things couldn't get any worse, that pink-faced pig-f*cker Cameron - who landed us in this mess in the first place - feels emboldened enough to raise his ugly pink face. **** should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. ANY town.

Aye, Dodgy Dave is back and advising DisMay.

 

[Is it PotG?]

I think we should have a second Chillcot enquiry, I was happy with last one..

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Whilst reporting that some pro Brexit campaigners in yellow jackets were shouting misogynist stuff at Kay and that I was “not British” and “a rapist” ... well done all who helped create this situation. Good job.

Faisal islam from sky news

 

[pb21]

Just when you think things couldn't get any worse, that pink-faced pig-f*cker Cameron - who landed us in this mess in the first place - feels emboldened enough to raise his ugly pink face. **** should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. ANY town.

You know things are VERY BAD when Dave is back in the picture.

 

[Triggaaar]

The figure comes from Treasury estimates of how much smaller the economy would be if we end up with a Canada style free trade agreement

That's the Treasury that want us to remain, and that were employed by the government to produce figures that supported the remain campaign, producing figures for a style of trade agreement that we won't get. It didn't have those caveats on the posters did it. They said we will be £4,300 worse off. We won't. It was a lie.

 

[Stat Brother]

A short while ago:-

 

[Bwian]

That's the Treasury that want us to remain, and that were employed by the government to produce figures that supported the remain campaign, producing figures for a style of trade agreement that we won't get. It didn't have those caveats on the posters did it. They said we will be £4,300 worse off. We won't. It was a lie.

Not looking for an argument-merely clarification:

What figures from which sources do you have that support your claims that "It was a lie"?

Whether you voted Remain or Leave-this is a Clusterfook of epic proportions and whichever side of the fence you sit on it is obvious that we are going to be worse off for a considerable period of time. Before the economy goes totally tits up (more than it has at the moment) wouldn't it make sense to put Article 50 on pause until ALL of the facts have been presented to us all? From Both Sides.

Let both sides present things exactly as they are-without the Bullshit. If Leave can show us exactly what will happen after March 29 2019 and that things will be significantly better than they are at the moment then you'll have won your argument for us to leave. Present us all with facts, nothing more, nothing less? No Coloured Unicorns for everybody once we've left/stayed. The situation we find ourselves in deserves a lot more than "Leave Means Leave-get on with it". As things stand right now we'll have no trade deals in place and a pound crashing through the floor much to the delight of Rees Moggy, Johnson and co. because they stand to make fortunes from their Hedge Funds at our expense.