Hampster Gull
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,465
as I keep saying there's no need, that was decided in the referendum vote , , leave means leave not keeping one foot in the door and that 's what TM's plan incurs therefore she needs to be removed from office and we get out of the EU completely
regards
DR
I just saw the Chichester MP Gillian Keegan interviewed live on Sky News and basically say the more she actually thinks about May's deal, the more she thinks its actually better than the status quo for the country going forward with a straight face.
Not even half one in the afternoon and she must have been more drunk than I was last night.
But I'm tempted to support it being voted down in parliament because that's almost certain to lead to Peoples Vote and staying in.
The sooner we get a People's Vote the better.
Yeah, I don't like it, I'm opposed to it as I want to remain, you're opposed because you want something a lot harder (I presume). So support for the deal is low - but that definitely does NOT mean that we are all on the Moggites side and want a harder exit. A majority of leavers may think it doesn't respect the referendum result, but I doubt that's the case amongst the remainers, and we make up half the population. If you force the 48% to choose a kind of leave, I bet the vast majority of us will choose the softest leave available.
Deporting all the foreigners living and working here home was never part of Leave agenda - and you know it, so please don't try inventing something you think enhances your point................it puts an end to free movement for work so only the more radical anti-immigration crowd will dislike that those already here can stay.
I just saw the Chichester MP Gillian Keegan interviewed live on Sky News and basically say the more she actually thinks about May's deal, the more she thinks its actually better than the status quo for the country going forward with a straight face.
Not even half one in the afternoon and she must have been more drunk than I was last night.
There are some hideous women in the Tory party right now
"although it leaves us weaker" , you need to give your head a wobbleYou are spot on, but the people who voted leave do not have any time or stomach for this reality, they or the Brextremists anyway just want to leave regardless of how difficult or indeed impossible their ideals are, sometimes people cannot get all they want so are prepared to compromise, not so these political extremists and their followers, my personal opinion is much like yours and although my preferred option would be to tear this up and remain I am prepared to accept this "deal" although it leaves us weaker in as much we obey rules and regulations of which we would have no say in their formulation, but stability for our immediate future is not too compromised, but then as stated I am a remainer, good luck to anybody trying to convince all the other side of the divide that this is acceptable, many moderates in both camps will, but is this enough to carry the day?
"although it leaves us weaker" , you need to give your head a wobble
regards
DR
just so Undemocratic , it's their only life line they cling on to, it wasn't a difficult choice Remain or leave , LEAVE WON THE VOTE SO THEREFORE WE LEAVE not one foot in one foot outWhy do remainers keep banging on about a 'People's Vote'. Just who (or what) did they think voted in 2016 - dogs? Cats? Budgerigars? Who knows?
One undeniable fact, however, is that a huge majority of Westminster politicians did not and do not want to leave the EU; they are, in fact, very, very keen to remain. Any second referendum, then, far from being a People's Vote would in fact be a Politicians' Vote, their attempt to find a way to overturn the original vote.
not sniping just making a point , why would you want to be in a weaker position and having no say in itHave you nothing better to do than snipe at every possible opinion that does not entirely conform to your senseless diatribe??
Why do remainers keep banging on about a 'People's Vote'. Just who (or what) did they think voted in 2016 - dogs? Cats? Budgerigars? Who knows?
One undeniable fact, however, is that a huge majority of Westminster politicians did not and do not want to leave the EU; they are, in fact, very, very keen to remain. Any second referendum, then, far from being a People's Vote would in fact be a Politicians' Vote, their attempt to find a way to overturn the original vote.
why are they shit scared, project fear and media bias toward remain are bound to have an effect over a period of time but that should not deter from a Democratic result which was to LEAVE the EU , what would your views be if you lost again ?It's not difficult. People are more aware of what the ramifications of leaving are. Poor campaigns on both sides last time.
Perhaps you can explain exactly why Brexiters are so shit scared of another referendum to decide?
why are they shit scared, project fear and media bias toward remain are bound to have an effect over a period of time but that should not deter from a Democratic result which was to LEAVE the EU , what would your views be if you lost again ?
regards
DR
but they knew what their constituents wanted and haven't acted on their behalf , that's half of the problem , The house of lords is another classic example of ignoring the resultDepends on the wording. Think it should be a two tier vote. First vote on whether we should remain or leave. 2nd question should be if the vote is to leave, should completely walk away or agree proposal on the table. That would give a clear indication of the public choice so would be very difficult to object to the outcome. MPs would also know what their constituents want.
not sniping just making a point , why would you want to be in a weaker position and having no say in it
regards
DR
Deporting all the foreigners living and working here home was never part of Leave agenda - and you know it, so please don't try inventing something you think enhances your point.