Key point here: "it WAS the will". If we are not allowed to change our minds what sort of world do we live in!.
It didn’t stop May calling an election a short while after the previous one. What happened to the will of the people then?
Key point here: "it WAS the will". If we are not allowed to change our minds what sort of world do we live in!.
laughing at you is more like it,the obsession continuesThey also won’t be held to ransom by May and her limp wristed cohorts. They’re laughing at us.
FFS. It was manufacturing I said was in recession. And the you, yes you, posted a link to challenge this. I then pointed out your link, yes yours, also stated another sector, construction II think, was contracting. Do keep up, with yourself.
Have all you Brexiteers taken idiot pills today?
was it a referendumit didn’t stop may calling an election a short while after the previous one. What happened to the will of the people then?
The other day you quoted figures saying that housing or house building was in recession - these figures prove that not to be the case..
FFS. It was manufacturing I said was in recession.
You stated that manufacturing was in recession.
Yes I know I did, I reminded you.
You’re all over the place tonight. What the **** is wrong with you ?
I love watching Larus tie himself up in knots trying to best people on here . And failing every time.
I know. And you can tell by the little Danny Dyer-esqe keep-trying-pal comment at the end he’s getting angry. He’ll be back with his over-egged “I’m chilled me” routine tomorrow.....foooling no one. To be fair, his little post anger routine at least demonstrates some self awareness; sadly lacking in some others.
Oh, and he also most likely bat-back a few of these comments; you smell, no you smell styleeee.
Try it this way.
We voted to leave and the natural conclusion to the process of withdrawing is we leave.
If Corbyn wins the next election the natural conclusion is he attends the palace the day after and is invited to be prime minister and form a government.
Why would you tell Mr Corbyn sorry, some people dont agree with the result, the election must therefore be redone before the natural conclusion of being asked to form a government.
This is what you are advocating.What is democratic about that?
Not enough time is also bullshit. May called an election on the 18th of April and it was held on the 8th of June.
And yet the Electrol Commission say there isn't enough time .... forgive me if I take their word rather than yours.
So how come the general election could be done? It is possible the no time excuse is utter bullshit.
Scared then.
What is less democratic: enacting a 2 year old opinion or following the current will of the people? They could be the same or different but you would rather not check? That is some bullshit democracy you have there.
Why would you accept a second referendum when you've spent months and months making your mind up for the first one that was clear? In or Out of the European UnionIf brexit is the will of people they would not hesitate to have a second referendum. The fact they are so opposed to it speaks volumes.
They’re absolutely petrified of a second referendum. I think they are worried about looking silly which is odd because it hasn’t worried them on here ! Hehe!
I love watching Larus tie himself up in knots trying to best people on here . And failing every time.
So how come the general election could be done? It is possible the no time excuse is utter bullshit.
This is not the best of comparisons.
A general election is normally enacted immediately. If Labour won the next one Corbyn could expect to be on his way to the Palace within hours. The new government would be rolling by tomorrow. The 2016 referendum was to quite a different timescale. Arrangements were put in place right away to enact the result but after two years, for various good reasons, the process is still rolling. Enacting the result is more complex and confusing than many people thought it would be. New considerations, nuances, options are arising all the time. There is evidence (not conclusive, but possibly impressive) that the voters are modifying their view.
It is wrong to compare this with the snap effects of a normal general election. It has something in common with the situation in 1974, when Wilson, faced with a muddy outcome in the spring (I think), went back to the people before the year was over. Something in common too with 2015/2017, when May felt that the answer given by the people to Cameron in '15 wasn't what she wanted and so, with much of the Conservative manifesto still on the shelf, she asked them again.
No one queried those situations then, and no one need query this one now. Especially as, unlike a general election, the effects of the 2016 vote will affect our country for decades.
Probably best you avoid things you cant understand and leave matters to the grown ups.
So you dont have him on ignore even though you said you did...........you really are a gift.
Oh come on. They can pass an act of parliament in less than 6 months! If they can't do that we are all ****ed.
#lazy*****