Lots of bile being generated over EU 'threats' on the consequences of a no-deal Brexit. But what happens is that at 23.01 hours on 29th March 2018 we simply stop being a member of the EU - we become at this moment a 3rd party nation (such as, say, south Africa).
Given that we've spent the last 45 years or so becoming - reluctantly - closer enmeshed in EU Treaties, policies and procedures, it could be extremely unlikely to undertake this process without some disruption. If people point out this disruption they are not necessarily bullying, hectoring or scoring points.
It's just a case of Leavers being confronted with the logical consequences of their preferences.(And the rest of us picking up the tab.)
Your post said about asking for their money back in 2068, so it appeared to be about money. I didn’t watch to clip of JRM.
Notwithstanding that, thank you for a courteous and considered response. Maybe if there was more like that on here the level of friction would be finished noticeably.
I only dip in and out of this thread as I find the adversarial nature and blinkered responses frustrating - I will include myself in that as I get annoyed by the constant comments from the Remain supporters that the Leavers are stupid, racist/xenophobic and old, and that we believed the £350m for the NHS statement etc. As you say, the reality is far more nuanced and, if everyone is honest, no one really knows how this will pan out.
Once we leave, there will be disruption. Most leavers expect that, but it will be short-term for most things. Other things may take longer to resolve. However, the leavers view things like parliamentary democracy as more important than some short-term disruption. That will be overcome and resolved. I accept that MPs leave a lot to be desired, but I actually have more confidence in the UK parliament to set legislation for the benefit of the UK than I do the technocrats in the EU who are not accountable.
The other issue which alienates the leave voters is that they don’t seem to accept that a number of people who may have noted to remain did so out of the fear from the remain campaign. They only seem to think that the leave side was at fault. If you read the link from my post a short while ago, the remain campaign/government has now been criticised by a cross-party committee.
Would you admit that there is a history of lies to the electorate from government/business on this subject of the EU/EURO? We’ve had threats about business moving away before and nothing happens both in regards the EURO and also if we voted to leave, not when we leave.
Hopefully people will start to see Brexit MPs as the traitors they are.
Hopefully people will start to see Brexit MPs as the traitors they are.
How do you equate implementing the will of the people (i.e. the referendum and both main parties in the GE stated they would implement Brexit), with being a traitor?
[MENTION=12947]Lincoln Imp[/MENTION] - this is the type of crap which drives me to despair. How can there be a sensible debate when idiotic statements like this are here?
How do you equate implementing the will of the people (i.e. the referendum and both main parties in the GE stated they would implement Brexit), with being a traitor?
[MENTION=12947]Lincoln Imp[/MENTION] - this is the type of crap which drives me to despair. How can there be a sensible debate when idiotic statements like this are here?
It is against all that Britain stands for. They manipulated the people during the vote and are now trying to carry it out for their own political gain regardless of if it harms the people or not.
I see I'm not the only one with a postcard from HT and Watford Gap on their Balearics idyll.
View attachment 98951
View attachment 98952
No it isn't. It is however what Britain voted for.It is against all that Britain stands for.
No they didn't - but do carry on. It's delightful to see someone making the remain side look petty and ridiculous!They manipulated the people during the vote.
Thing is all current polls show that the will of the people, now people are better informed about the e onomix consequences of Brexit, is now to REMAIN in the EU. When does what people thought in 2016 become irrelevant?
OK, let’s follow your logic through (assuming that one or two polls supercedes a national vote with circa 34m people casting a vote).
If the polls change back to say people have changed their minds to want Remain, but then in 6 months time polls show that they have changed their mind a again back to leave, are you saying that we should then leave?
If not, why not? Do you believe in democracy, or just democracy which reflects your views?
Most intelligent people accept that we voted to leave.
Most intelligent people accept that it will be implemented.
There are differing views as to what remain means, but most people would accept that it encompasses:
End of free movement.
End of jurisdiction of the ECJ
Ability to negotiate own free trade deals.
Stopping large contributions to EU budget.
Remain encompasses End of free movement, End of jurisdiction of the ECJ and Ability to negotiate own free trade deals ? It's just gibberish
Like most intelligent people believe it's possible to implement WTO rules and tariffs with no borders, customs posts, IT systems or staff ?
You just keep telling everyone what most intelligent people think
Remain encompasses End of free movement, End of jurisdiction of the ECJ and Ability to negotiate own free trade deals ? It's just gibberish
Like most intelligent people believe it's possible to implement WTO rules and tariffs with no borders, customs posts, IT systems or staff ?
You just keep telling everyone what most intelligent people think
I was in the Adriatic the week before last, HT is in the Balearics this week. Probably the closest you've been to a correct answer on this thread though
Most intelligent people think you flounced away a week ago,and are a complete tosspot.Hope the Adriatic can recover soon from being polluted by you,probably the closest you haver been to coming clean.I hope you were looking to move their full time.
Thoughts, larus?