[Politics] Brexit

[The Clamp]

IMF lady issuing a warning, Breaking News from the clamp.
Finger on the pulse as ever to developing situations.
Shame that in your frantic rush to find a current negative news story surrounding Brexit on the internet you forgot to check your link was 3 months old.
What a wally.

Breaking news from Pastafarian as he quotes something I posted days ago. You that desperate to have a dig at five to seven in the morning that you trawl back days to find something to have a go at? Desperate doesn't begin to cover it.

 

[Lincoln Imp]

Good to see you have finally come round to the notion that another referendum on this big decision should not happen and be left up to the general public and that the big decisions about Brexit after the initial advice from the will of the people should now rest in the hands of Parliament.
I knew you would change your mind eventually after listening to our common sense.

And equally good to see that you have finally agreed that the last referendum on this big issue should not have happened and that the big decision on Britain's membership of the EU should have rested in the hands of Parliament. As far as receiving 'advice from the will of the people' is concerned the constitution has an established mechanism for doing that.

 

[Baldseagull]

Agree its obvious you didn’t read the text that’s why you wrongly decided to insert whiteness as a reason. Not sure you still have read the text, when you ask instead “Perhaps it is an anti Islamic thing rather than a white thing” you must have missed the bit that says “In fact, the only area that the majority of people didn’t think was important was a migrant’s religion”. So well done again for missing the point and inventing reasoning that’s not there.

But we are not building an immigration policy on public opinion so its rather pointless you keep saying “if” we did. But pray tell what is racist about the public or its opinion?

If we are not building an immigration policy around public opinion, it would be possible to have a policy where EU citizens could come and take work without requiring a work permit, but this is a red line in negotiations we are told. We are not just building an immigration policy over public opinion on immigration, we are leaving the EU over the public opinion on immigration, do not pretend that the narrow majority would have come in for leave, without the issue of free movement of people.

People saying religion is not important, when asked if religion should be a factor, may give the answer no, but when they then choose Islamic countries as the ones they would most like to reduce numbers from, despite virtually zero immigration from either Egypt or Turkey in the last ten years, it speaks for itself. 5 out of 6 of the countries people most wanted to reduce numbers from, are Islamic majority countries, only Romania joining them, no Islamic majority country above this bottom 6 in the survey.
You tell me why people would want to see less Turks and Egyptians more than less Poles and Indians, when there are around 1.5Million Polish and Indian born, and less than 150,000 Turkish and Egyptian born combined. Roughly similar numbers of Irish born and Pakistani born people in the uk today, but the survey says we want more, not less, Irish, yet Pakistanis are not so welcome.
Pray tell me how this is not racist?

Can you also tell me why Mexicans appear to be so unwelcome?

 

[Baldseagull]

Thats awful
Can you please please please share your evidence of corruption..............would hate to think you are inventing stuff.

Liam Fox.

 

[Baldseagull]

You dont understand Parliamentary procedure do you?
Lets start at the beginning, how do you achieve Henry VIII powers on an act of parliament?

You pretend you only want to tweak some minor stuff, point out the time sensitivity and hope for the best.

 

[Baldseagull]

Thats awful
Can you please please please share your evidence of corruption..............would hate to think you are inventing stuff.

Boris Johnson.

 

[beorhthelm]

You will thank her one day, in keeping the b*****ds honest. This government must be the most corrupt we've in a century

your using a new definition of "corrupt" and making a bigger issue of the Miller issue than it is - all expenditure has to be approved ultimately by parliament through the Finance bill.

 

[nicko31]

Thats awful
Can you please please please share your evidence of corruption..............would hate to think you are inventing stuff.

Without much thought and mentioning corrupt individuals....

£1BN bung to DUP, violation of data protection and election rules, trying to bypass parliament with Brexit, the European Research Group the list goes on. They are the lowest of the low, I didn't think I'd ever ever say this but I'd than have Corbyn at the helm..

 

[Two Professors]

If we are not building an immigration policy around public opinion, it would be possible to have a policy where EU citizens could come and take work without requiring a work permit, but this is a red line in negotiations we are told. We are not just building an immigration policy over public opinion on immigration, we are leaving the EU over the public opinion on immigration, do not pretend that the narrow majority would have come in for leave, without the issue of free movement of people.

People saying religion is not important, when asked if religion should be a factor, may give the answer no, but when they then choose Islamic countries as the ones they would most like to reduce numbers from, despite virtually zero immigration from either Egypt or Turkey in the last ten years, it speaks for itself. 5 out of 6 of the countries people most wanted to reduce numbers from, are Islamic majority countries, only Romania joining them, no Islamic majority country above this bottom 6 in the survey.
You tell me why people would want to see less Turks and Egyptians more than less Poles and Indians, when there are around 1.5Million Polish and Indian born, and less than 150,000 Turkish and Egyptian born combined. Roughly similar numbers of Irish born and Pakistani born people in the uk today, but the survey says we want more, not less, Irish, yet Pakistanis are not so welcome.
Pray tell me how this is not racist?

Can you also tell me why Mexicans appear to be so unwelcome?

Possibly,the countries at the bottom of the list are the ones that have not worked out how to use toilet paper yet,and still use their hand to wipe.

 

[Baldseagull]

Possibly,the countries at the bottom of the list are the ones that have not worked out how to use toilet paper yet,and still use their hand to wipe.

I can only manage one idiot at a time, please wait your turn.

 

[studio150]

Difficult reading for leavers

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/11/uk-sweet-brexit-deluded-eu-europe-single-economy

 

[Two Professors]

Difficult reading for leavers

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/11/uk-sweet-brexit-deluded-eu-europe-single-economy

Not difficult at all.Just one bitter and twisted persons view to liven up a failing newspaper.What was that cracking novel of his?'A good man sometimes beats his wife'?

 

[Two Professors]

I can only manage one idiot at a time, please wait your turn.

Oh,sorry,Mrs. Baldeagle.I will wait till you let your hubby back on!

 

[nicko31]

Difficult reading for leavers

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/11/uk-sweet-brexit-deluded-eu-europe-single-economy

Indeed if we crash out it will hurt the EU but it will hurt us a lot more. Its something Brexiteers are only just starting to realise and many still won't admit

Just hope the EU agrees to a transitional period or basically we are screwed

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

The lunch the prime minister served her top brass at Chequers in February, as they plotted their election strategy, as described in a new book about the 2017 campaign, Betting the House, by Tim Ross and Tom McTague was chicken lasagne and boiled potatoes."

WTF. Who puts chicken in lasagne? Clueless.

 

[CHAPPERS]

The lunch the prime minister served her top brass at Chequers in February, as they plotted their election strategy, as described in a new book about the 2017 campaign, Betting the House, by Tim Ross and Tom McTague was chicken lasagne and boiled potatoes."

WTF. Who puts chicken in lasagne? Clueless.

She just heated loads of these through and billed the taxpayer for a few hundred.

 

[Jim D]

WTF. Who puts chicken in lasagne? Clueless.

People that want to reduce their fat and cholesterol intake? But apart from that I'm shocked that she served poncy foreign food rather than good old British grub.

 

[Two Professors]

The lunch the prime minister served her top brass at Chequers in February, as they plotted their election strategy, as described in a new book about the 2017 campaign, Betting the House, by Tim Ross and Tom McTague was chicken lasagne and boiled potatoes."

WTF. Who puts chicken in lasagne? Clueless.

Possibly not a true European lasagna,but for people who appreciate good food:

 

[beorhthelm]

Difficult reading for leavers

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/11/uk-sweet-brexit-deluded-eu-europe-single-economy

The EU is rapidly evolving into something far more ambitious than just a free trade area: it is in the process of becoming one huge economic zone governed by a single set of rules and standards and overseen by a single European court of justice, striking trade deals with the rest of the world and deriving its logic and coherence from the four famous freedoms of goods, capital, services and labour. Products such as cars, computers or aeroplanes are now built from components made in factories and production units scattered across the EU, with employees moving seamlessly between them. For this reason “single economy” is a far better term than “single market”.

being reminded of a very good reasons for leaving is hardly difficult reading. a "single economy" needs a single fiscal policy, and aspires to be a single state. if the EU really wont avoid damage to themselves in the belief of "self-preservation" by retaining a rigid set of rules, that just tells us more about how they intend to run their state and more reason to not be a part of it.

 

[5ways]

being reminded of a very good reasons for leaving is hardly difficult reading. a "single economy" needs a single fiscal policy, and aspires to be a single state. if the EU really wont avoid damage to themselves in the belief of "self-preservation" by retaining a rigid set of rules, that just tells us more about how they intend to run their state and more reason to not be a part of it.

Of course we would have retained an independent fiscal policy.