That's a lot of irrelevant speculation. However let's start with something we can agree on: if it wasn't for Tony Bloom we wouldn't be getting a new ground and we wouldn't be splashing out 250k on the likes of Greer. Like a several clubs part of our income stream is 'Sugar Daddy Investment'.It could happen to us. Many people here think Bloom is fantastically rich, and if he started opening the check-book and signing all kinds of great players, Lua Lua for 2 million on a five-year deal, couple of million pound strikers, and we get promoted and promoted again, wages go up, then its five million quid players, cup runs, Poyet's a hero, Falmer sold out....... who here isn't enjoying the ride?
and then Bloom leaves, Poyet goes to Arsenal, the latest 8 million pound player is a flop, the football gets crap, attendances drop, relegation is followed by mediocrity, the top wage earners aren't performing - and suddenly we're 100 million in debt and in administration.
It can happen. It does happen. and I bet you wouldn't hear a whisker of discontent during the first half of that scenario.
And anyway, why should you see it coming? When you've got a multi-millionaire owner pouring money into the team, and flying high in the league, why believe it will suddenly stop? Any whispers of concern are drowned out by cries of !they love our club and will never leave, we're getting TV money, we can sell the best players if it goes wrong, parachute payments will keep us afloat!. And if you force the rich owner out, doesn't all unravel quicker anyway?
You're theoretically right - but by your logic Man City fans should be trying to get their owners out and Chelsea fans should be organising protests against Abramovic. Pull the funding, don't find a buyer and those teams will struggle to meet their bills. We just saw it with Liverpool. Perhaps Wigan and Blackburn fans should have held walk-out protests during their rise? Perhaps you agree? Perhaps I agree. If we sign Lua Lua and Healy I'll start the Bloom Out chants!!
Its all built on individuals with lots of money, its not sustainable, and for every Wigan you get a Darlington, every Fulham there's a Leicester. Don't single the Pompey fans out because they're the same as the rest of us.
I feel more sorry for fans of Scunthorpe or Barnsley or even Palace: whichever team gets relegated this season because they only used players they could afford while Pompey cheated and signed the likes of Kitson and Lawrence on £20k per week while at the same time telling their non-footballing creditors to go f*** themselves.
I feel more sorry for fans of Scunthorpe or Barnsley or even Palace: whichever team gets relegated this season because they only used players they could afford while Pompey cheated and signed the likes of Kitson and Lawrence on £20k per week while at the same time telling their non-footballing creditors to go f*** themselves.
I just cannot get my head around this from the BBC website:
Portsmouth's debt at one point stood at around £120m before they entered administration last season and were ultimately relegated. If the club closes there'll be nothing for anybody, including Mr Gaydamak.
Administrator Andrew Andronikou Andronikou confirmed a deal worth 20p in the pound to unsecured creditors had been agreed, but he added that the club could still go into liquidation despite being close to securing their future
How can a Premiershite club, with all the millions they get run up a £120m debt and then be allowed to agree to pay back only 20%?
Scandalous. Jail the people who allowed this to happen.
Yet again Portsmouth rears its head as the disgrace to the name of English football
every game that Portsmouth wins is the symbol of cheating, money grabbing, self sympathetic ugliness.
I see that Paul Duffen (ex Hull Chairman)wants to buy Portsmouth.
What is it about Portsmouth that attracts only crooks....?
It's like watching flies on a piece of shit.