Marty McFly
Seagulls Over Canada
Also Williams fuel samples as well, so Hamilton could finish 4th.
Nooooo - I've already withdrawn my winnings from Raikkonen(sp?) winning the championship.
Also Williams fuel samples as well, so Hamilton could finish 4th.
Surely the most unsatisfactory way to win a world title ever?
I'd agree, it's also quite a difficult one for the stewards to call. If the Williams and BMW cars have broken the regulations, then I suppose by rights they should be disqualified. But is it right or fair to strip Raikkonen of the title through no fault of his own?
A statement from the sport's governing body, the FIA, said the fuel in the cars was "more than [the permitted] 10 degrees below the ambient temperature".
The statement said Heidfeld's fuel was 13C lower than ambient at his first stop and 12C lower at his second.
Kubica's varied by 14C, 13C and 13C at his three stops, while Rosberg's was 13C and 12C out at his two stops.
Filling the car with cooler fuel can give a car an advantage.
Cooler fuel is denser, so either it can mean it takes slightly less time to refuel the car or marginally more can be added in the same time.
And it would give a slight power advantage for about three laps before it returned to ambient temperature out on the track.
Excluding the cars would risk turning one of the most exciting championship finales in F1 history into a farce.
But if the cars are found to have run fuel below the legal temperature, the stewards might feel obliged to disqualify them, even though the advantage conferred would almost certainly have had no bearing on the title race.
However, there is a precedent that could be used by race stewards not to exclude them.
In 1995, the Benetton-Renault of Michael Schumacher and the Williams-Renault of David Coulthard were initially disqualified from first and second places in the Brazilian Grand Prix because their fuel did not conform to samples approved by the FIA.
But a week later the FIA reinstated the drivers' points but docked the teams their constructors' points.
In that case, though, no advantage was gained by the irregularity.
There was a late twist when it emerged race officials were investigating the fuel used by Williams and BMW Sauber, whose cars filled fourth, fifth and sixth places.
But the stewards decided to impose no penalty.
Hamilton appealing, wrong move I reckon
he should be gracious in defeat
With the millions of dollars for winning the Driver's Championship it makes sense to appeal on the off-chance that the stewards agree. Especially for a team that's been fined $100m (or was it euros?)From what I read, it's the McLaren team who are appealing, rather than Lewis Hamilton himself.
I still think they should abide by the ruling and let what's done be done, but never mind.
Im not putting it all on him, I just think he had a great chance and he blew it.
We always seem to cheer a brave loser in this country.
Yes maybe, but he managed to muck it up today on his own, I have no idea what he was trying at start.
He made a mistake at the start, but that mistake didn't cost him the world title. His car suddenly losing all its gears for 40 seconds cost him the World Championship.