Not at all as I dont care about my post count its only other who worry about it but my point is had you and others like you not mentioned it nobody would have been any the wiser so you did him no favours, whether it be by design or not.
Not contents with knocking a man when he is down he now starts a new thread about it.
He'll come through this, eventually, a stronger and hopefully wiser character.
If and when we lose the Ashes, just remember that The Sun is effectively owned by Rupert Murdoch b. Melbourne, Australia.
Weird post!
Press going for it. Express and Sun running a video of him mocking Harvey Price
I'm not sure that Stokes deserves any consideration for his feelings after watching his Harvey piss take video. The guy's obviously a complete knob. What sort of person thinks that sort of behaviour is remotely funny apart from the laughing sycophants he clearly surrounds himself with. Behaving like that in the first place is bad enough but to consider it hilarious enough to be worthy of filming is just sad and pathetic. I think he deserves as much embarassment as that video brings him. It wasn't even as if he was being secretly filmed and then set up as his little performance was quite clearly for the benefit of the camera.
As far as the fight video was concerned I was prepared to accept there were extenuating circumstances, but the Harvey video just exposed him for the unpleasant and unfunny individual he obviously is.
I always thought Bayliss was old school. I thought the punishment would be along the lines of 'Straussy, Tell Ben to calm down a bit old chap'
This is well above Bayliss's call. You'd imagine he's doing everything to make sure Stokes is in Australia.
You can see 1 of them has a bottle & tries to use it at start.
+ now reported he may have been defending against 2 homophobes - which makes it all alright then to the PC brigade.
The people who care are those paying him hundreds of thousands of pounds to represent their brands / the ECB. You take that money, you live by their rules.
You can see 1 of them has a bottle & tries to use it at start.
+ now reported he may have been defending against 2 homophobes - which makes it all alright then to the PC brigade.
4 years ago Stokes was sent home from an England Lions tour for 'persistent late night drinking.'
There's a problem deeper than him having a tear up here.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cr...-tour-for-persistent-late-night-drinking.html
I don't believe the latest homophobe slant. I think it's just a desperate and cynical attempt by Stokes to portray himself as some sort of knight in shining armour standing up for the vulnerable. So we're expected to believe that he is a man of such strong moral conviction that he is prepared to risk a GBH charge to take a stand against the persecution of gays, while also considering it perfectly acceptable to publicly mock disabled children. Do me a favour. The man has just sunk to new depths with this latest desperate claim. It's despicable that he's now trying to exploit the genuine homophobia that gays have to endure for his own self interest.