BensGrandad
New member
Whoever and for whatever terms a team takes him will save Bournemouth money but obviously they will push for the maximum return possible.
and yet here we are again.That seems pretty unreasonable to me. We don't need to be spending £2m a year with no hope of recouping it.
It's a massive 'no ****ing way!' from me.
That seems pretty unreasonable to me. We don't need to be spending £2m a year with no hope of recouping it.
It's a massive 'no ****ing way!' from me.
Depending on who the Albion have coming up through the ranks, the team may well need 3 strikers.We need 2 strikers to replace Wilson and Zamora, it's as simple as that. I would hope and expect they will be upgrades on those two. They may well even be upgrades on Hemed and Baldock. But they will need to represent value is SOME other way. Either good enough to step up to the Premier League the following season (rather than be a 34 year old bit player) or outstanding value a la Knockaert. An aging striker looking for big wages and a cut down on the commute doesn't really fit either bill.
Eh? Not £2m each though.We're spending a lot more than £2M a year on players' wages at the moment - and there is no hope of recouping anything once we've put it into a player's pocket!
Depending on who the Albion have coming up through the ranks, the team may well need 3 strikers.
The only reason CH isn't spending big wads of Premier League cash, this summer, is because the team spent all of last season short of at least 1 striker.
But I'm not focusing on a single x or y, you are.Or because Lewis Dunk was sent off v Boro, or because Barton stayed on the pitch v Burnley or because Goldson scored an unfortunate own goal, or because Bruno couldn't keep Boro down to 2 goals instead of 3.
Its too easy to say we missed out on promotion because of a single x or y but i know its tempting to do so.
Of course we'll be strengthening up front this summer and that won't be cheap and I'm sure TB will back Hughton.
No doubt if Hemed had cost £6m or so instead of £1m or so , nobody would be making this argument.
Seems to me the cost of signing Murray will be £3m, ie if he is on £30k a week then that is the value of his contract at Bournemouth for the next two years. Presumably he is going to want the same pay off so if we paid him £15k a week and a fee to Bournemouth of £1.5m they use that to pay off that part of his contract and he comes here on a lower salary that doesn't upset our pay scales. We get a proven goalscorer at this level and Bournemouth clear their decks at, effectively, no cost.
The question is then whether CH wants him or not and whether they think he is fit enough to play at least one season! I'm sure they new BZ wasn't going to play regularly and I'm sure GM would and score more goals.
Even if GM does get paid up the money on his £30k a week contract he has now, why would he want to sign a new one at 50% less ?
To play football regularly.
Sure.. but in the real world we are talking about a player with 1 big contract left in him and that is what he will focus on. Maximising that
Perfect replacement for Zamora.
Perfect replacement for Zamora.