You know there is an argument for punk being ‘created’ in America right so what has their nationality got to do with it? Better than the Pistols IMO.
Yes I know. The Count Five. The Stooges. ? and the Mysterions. The Ramones. Jonathan Richman....
Then the UK thing. Fashion by Vivian Westwood. Music by the Damned, Clash and Pistols.
Except it wasn't really. Not in Brighton. Not even in London where I lived, 76-79. MacLaren gobbing off, great rock and roll swindle style, was all bollocks by 77. The actual bands that were playing and accessible were others. The Members...Sham 69...Wrist Action....X Ray Spex. Mark Perry had his finger on the pulse better than the likes of Tony Parson and Charles Shaar Murray. A lot of the bands were shit. Some were good. Yes we had a lot of time for the big three, but actually music moved on pretty quickly. By 77 we had the likes of Wire and Scrittti politti and Cabaret Voltaire....by the time I saw the Clash it was at the Top Rank....Gen X's much awaited first album was a bit old hat. The Bashees, who I saw in Brighton, disappared but released a great album....BUT it was not 'punk'...and then we had The Humam League, Comsats, Chamleons....it has all moved completely on.....
The 'second' wave of US 'punk' was ramalama dole Q soundalikley stuff. Black Flag, and other unlistenable shite. 1981 their first relase...can you imagine a London version of the mop tops in suits singing hard day's night type ditties - in 1968? It was a massive 'no thanks' from me. By 1981 I had a very long overcoat, a massive quiff, brothel creepers and hardly any make up at all. Punk wasn't simply dead, it had decomposed and been recycled.
Last edited: