being faithful

[Franks Wild Years]

I dunno what I am doing. Im not attention seeking, I rarely post more than 5 posts a day, 20 a week anymore, on here.

Maybe I have built up a controversial opinion of certian aspects? I'm just stating my view on it. Don't really see much harm in my post. In fact I think I may have disgraced my own population of men more than women suggesting we need sex more than women.

Adrie mate, sometimes its better just to keep schtum.

 

[NMH]

you should stop worrying about other people and get yourself a friend or two in real life mate. and my barman writes better english than you. :toss er:

Oh? What WOULD you know about my friends in 'real life'? And stop calling me 'mate', in your desperate search for male bonding on a football website.

By the way, it's English. You can hardly talk about speaking the lingo when you don't even write English with a capital 'E'.

 

[NMH]

Are you Watford O?

Charades!! Brilliant.

"Are you....so DON?"

I should've known.

 

[pasty]

By the way, it's English. You can hardly talk about speaking the lingo when you don't even write English with a capital 'E'.

Be fair NMH, he did say his barman wrote better English than you, not himself.

 

[Man of Harveys]

And there's me thinking that stan WAS lance, only in disguise...shame

 

[itszamora]

Whilst I don't agree with what Adrie says in that I think it's very difficult to not have an emotional attachment to a sexual partner (and I am a man btw), people are as per usual jumping down his throat for no apparent reason. There are some men who are like the ones he describes, so he does have something of a point although equally as Chappers points out there are as many women who are the same.

 

[NMH]

Be fair NMH, he did say his barman wrote better English than you, not himself.

Ah yes, his barman, thinks of him as his best 'mate'. No doubt.

 

[Buzzer]

Whilst I don't agree with what Adrie says in that I think it's very difficult to not have an emotional attachment to a sexual partner (and I am a man btw), people are as per usual jumping down his throat for no apparent reason. There are some men who are like the ones he describes, so he does have something of a point although equally as Chappers points out there are as many women who are the same.

If by that you mean me (and possibly Frank Wild Years), then I think you're wrong and hope others (and esp. Adrie) can see that. I was hoping my remarks were good-natured, tempered and reasoned. There was certainly no malice intended and sorry if it came across like that.

 

[sir albion]

It is wrong to stray of course,but lifes a bitch and it happens

 

[hans kraay fan club]

I don't think I will ever cheat.

I think you may be right.

 

[bhaexpress]

I think that making sweeping generalizations about which sex has emotions about sex is entirely spurious. As it is some men to attach a different meaning to having sex than other men and it's precisely the same with women. there are quite a few women that see sex and just sex whereas others see it as 'making love'. I wouldn't profess to be the 'Man of Experience' of NSC but I would hazard a guess I have met a few more women than some.

Personally I consider sex without emotion little more than masturbation but that's just me and I know I don't speak for everyone here. However I have met women who use sex for both gratification and personal gain and most certainly not for emotional fulfillment. I can't see the point of having an affair but I am both lazy and happy with my partner so once again I speak for myself only.

 

[Yorkie]

stan miguell is a dirty old man.

Good fishing by Stan. Plenty taking the bait.

I divorced my first husband for his affair with a younger woman after 21 years of marriage.
I re-married 3 years later. I'm very happy, have my own home and a wonderful husband. He's still with her and as miserable as sin, become bankrupt and suffering with health problems.

There's a moral there somewhere.

 

[¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤]

I'm no David Attenborough but do any other male mammalians stay with the same partner for life?

It's just nature you see, to spread our seed as much as possible and all that

 

[hitony]

I'm no David Attenborough but do any other male mammalians stay with the same partner for life?

It's just nature you see, to spread our seed as much as possible and all that

You certainly spread your seed as much as possible eh mate

Hiya danny long time no see mate

 

[Starry]

is there anything wrong with taking a bit on the side when you are married?

something wrong with your marriage if you are thinking that way.

 

[stan miguell]

Good fishing by Stan. Plenty taking the bait.

I divorced my first husband for his affair with a younger woman after 21 years of marriage.
I re-married 3 years later. I'm very happy, have my own home and a wonderful husband. He's still with her and as miserable as sin, become bankrupt and suffering with health problems.

There's a moral there somewhere.

if you ever fancy a bit of "chorizo' you let me know you cheeky young lady

 

[Stumpy Tim]

I don't think stan is TWATTY. He doesn't post enough

 

[Simster]

if you ever fancy a bit of "chorizo' you let me know you cheeky young lady

Which bit of her post did you not understand?

 

[NMH]

Good fishing by Stan. Plenty taking the bait.

I divorced my first husband for his affair with a younger woman after 21 years of marriage.
I re-married 3 years later. I'm very happy, have my own home and a wonderful husband. He's still with her and as miserable as sin, become bankrupt and suffering with health problems.

There's a moral there somewhere.

Erm.....your spells and curses worked?

 

[Mackenzie]

is there anything wrong with taking a bit on the side when you are married?

i am 67 and i wish i had done a bit more fooling around when i was a youngster. its only sex isnt it?

what does NSC think about this?

It depends really if you are happy and fulfilled in your relationship I would think, if you were why would you need to look elsewhere?

If you're not happy then do somthing about it.