The Large One
Who's Next?
The breathtaking arrogance of this 'man' is astounding. Not only has he been proved to be wrong, he then flatly denies it (although to be honest, this is the kind of response I was expecting from him), and tries changing the rules, all in the name of saving face. This whole argument, and ultimately his own petard, could have been spared if he hadn't made such a daft statement in the first place. We all make statements we think we can back up, then admit defeat when proved wrong, but it is evidently beyond this person's capability to do so.
So we're clearly beyond the realms of arrogance and into the world of stupidity. In a reasoned and sensible debating circle, this is not someone who can be taken seriously. He makes spurious claims, backs them up with nothing, gets told the truth, and doesn't know how to handle it, living as he does in a world of complete denial. It is writ large though his diatribes in the Argus forums.
I don't want to be too explicit here, but the word that springs to mind most of all here is 'thick', which then sets the question, 'why are we bothering with him?'
So we're clearly beyond the realms of arrogance and into the world of stupidity. In a reasoned and sensible debating circle, this is not someone who can be taken seriously. He makes spurious claims, backs them up with nothing, gets told the truth, and doesn't know how to handle it, living as he does in a world of complete denial. It is writ large though his diatribes in the Argus forums.
I don't want to be too explicit here, but the word that springs to mind most of all here is 'thick', which then sets the question, 'why are we bothering with him?'