Doesn't that rather depend on whether or not you accept that some people can be pure evil and wicked, but not actually insane?Do you think someone who carries out a mass killing of children is sane?
Doesn't that rather depend on whether or not you accept that some people can be pure evil and wicked, but not actually insane?Do you think someone who carries out a mass killing of children is sane?
And is typical of some posters unfortunately.Well this thread has taken a pretty awful turn.
Wouldn’t the school have broken up for holidays? …report I read states a ‘studio’ for dance and yoga
I don't think so. The line is so fine it is negligible. The person that done this should get a one way ticket to a secure medical institution with the only exit via a body bag.Doesn't that rather depend on whether or not you accept that some people can be pure evil and wicked, but not actually insane?
For this kind of crime, where the guilt is beyond doubt, I quick execution is called for, not wasting time and money with courts, lawyers, metal health assessments and prison for the rest of his life at everyone's expense. If it where my child, that is what I would be calling for.I don't think so. The line is so fine it is negligible. The person that done this should get a one way ticket to a secure medical institution with the only exit via a body bag.
Mmmm i’d be asking for a week in a warehouse with a resuscitation team along with many ‘tools’ to inflict maximum pain to the point of near death and then rinse and repeatFor this kind of crime, where the guilt is beyond doubt, I quick execution is called for, not wasting time and money with courts, lawyers, metal health assessments and prison for the rest of his life at everyone's expense. If it where my child, that is what I would be calling for.
I understand your emotion, the last line is agreeable to most including myself, however the wording is flawed, if there is a quick execution “where guilt is beyond doubt” where does this leave those on very long/whole life terms that have been found guilty by twelve good men and true? It leaves this open for the Ian Huntley’s of this world to say “hang on a minute, I didn’t get executed so what are you saying? my case is not beyond doubt?”For this kind of crime, where the guilt is beyond doubt, I quick execution is called for, not wasting time and money with courts, lawyers, metal health assessments and prison for the rest of his life at everyone's expense. If it where my child, that is what I would be calling for.
Now I totally agree with your opinion on this one. I was having similar conversation about Valdo Calocane a little while back and got jumped on by those saying he wasn't criminally responsible as was having a psychotic episode at the time.For this kind of crime, where the guilt is beyond doubt, I quick execution is called for, not wasting time and money with courts, lawyers, metal health assessments and prison for the rest of his life at everyone's expense. If it where my child, that is what I would be calling for.
If not, presumably you believe that everyone who commits murder is insane. So committing murder is never a crime.Doesn't that rather depend on whether or not you accept that some people can be pure evil and wicked, but not actually insane?
was this fella having a psychotic episode though, how long do they last ? apparently he had a knife pre meditated, caught a taxi, refused to pay, and proceeded to attack defenceless children, he knew what he was doing, why target such defenceless souls, because he is weak and they are an easy target. This person has no function in society, will not be able to be rehabilitated. There is a chance he will go to jail, join a gang and become an inside hero for some, as sick as that sounds it is true. Under the current system, the best we can hope for is that he is targeted inside and has his eyes removed with a rusty shank.Now I totally agree with your opinion on this one. I was having similar conversation about Valdo Calocane a little while back and got jumped on by those saying he wasn't criminally responsible as was having a psychotic episode at the time.
Not really. Sanity includes making rational decisions that adhere to larger human mores. Thinking it is OK to kill kids is not sane. And doing bad things and enjoying it does not make you evil but sane, simply because you enjoyed the suffering.Doesn't that rather depend on whether or not you accept that some people can be pure evil and wicked, but not actually insane?
Yes…a yoga/dance party for those ages at a studioA party for kids 3 to 11.
Death penalty is wrong, full stop. Killing (outside of war or kill-or-be-killed self defense) is wrong.I understand your emotion, the last line is agreeable to most including myself, however the wording is flawed, if there is a quick execution “where guilt is beyond doubt” where does this leave those on very long/whole life terms that have been found guilty by twelve good men and true? It leaves this open for the Ian Huntley’s of this world to say “hang on a minute, I didn’t get executed so what are you saying? my case is not beyond doubt?”
Death row in the States is also proof it is a long winded, expensive process.
Hopefully, everyday for the next forty years will be a living hell for him.
Sanity is not judged by a jury any more than cancer is diagnosed by a jury.That's for the jury to decide, is it not?
Assuming they try get a manslaughter by diminished responsibility
Deleted.