Bollocks.BensGrandad said:All you ever want to do is say things that will not upset the board and contradict anybody who has a suggestion to improve the supporters lot.
Lord Bracknell said:As for the Spurs fiasco, it is increasingly looking like something has gone wrong in the particular way that these tickets were issued. First-come-first-served is a good SYSTEM, but did that system break down on this particular occasion?
It looks to me that it might well have done. Possibly the fault of the Royal Mail, but some people are reporting rejection letters being received by people who applied on days one and two (including people who hand delivered applications to the Ticket Office). If that is the case, then something has gone wrong in the Ticket Office. And that means that it will have to be investigated and rectified.
This from someone who wants the club to charge us for selling tickets? Or did you suggest that in the hope the club would actually do that so you could slag them off again?BensGrandad said:All you ever want to do is say things that will not upset the board and contradict anybody who has a suggestion to improve the supporters lot.
dougdeep said:It's only a game for sake.
TrevorDove said:Voted no - first come first served - you win some you lose some.
I want to go to football when I want - why should I have to be behind some saddo who goes to every game..
Football is great - but the not life changing FFS.
Uncle Buck said:OK, away ticket priority, well I think there should be something in place, but as ever the most vocal on here are going to argue against it, as much of NSC does not attend the run of the mill away games.
Personally I think the club should operate something similar to what the FA run via Englandfans for the distribution of away tickets for England games. 70% of the tickets are allocated to those with the most loyalty points, with the other 30% allocated via a ballot to the rest of applications, meaning that the most loyal are rewarded, whilst the floating support still have a chance of a ticket.
Now come the arguments of administating a scheme. Well the club have a database of every member of the AMS, so it would not be rocket science to mark against a member each time they bought a ticket, meaning you had a record of their away attendance (each time I do multiple applications, I get individual receipts with each members name, AMS number and home address, so the system is not that basic).
Regarding the fact that not all away games are all ticket, well this season, all games have had advanced ticket sales, so if such a scheme was introduced, if you wanted your away point, well you buy your ticket in advance. Those that do not, do not get an away point, tough luck. Now if the club decide that there is say a £15 pa admin fee on this scheme to cover the costs then fair enough, at least then the tickets will be distributed in a more fair way.
I'm sorry, BG, I have NO IDEA what the Club will or will not admit. Honesty with myself isn't an issue.BensGrandad said:Lord B
You know, if you are honest with yourself, that irrespective of the arguments and evidence showbn the club will not admit that their sytem fell down.
Bozza said:Does the Englandfans scheme cover both home and away games? If so, how would you practically translate such a scheme to a league club where you may have season ticket holders who never go away (bar the odd 'big' game) and those who go away only?
Curious Orange said:Okay, some practical points need to be made about administering any loyalty points scheme.
First off, database, clearly the club have a database but I doubt it records every game attended home and away (or tickets purchased for) by every fan. Developing the software to do this is inherently risky (it might f*ck up the system/data you already have). It would not be the simple thing some people think, and as a software tester I'm well aware that it wouldn't be. Obviously I know nothing about the system the club currently has, but for arguments sake let us assume it is MS Access. The club would first have to work out what additional tables, fields, and GUI changes they would require in order to administrate the system. They would then need to consider whether the database they are using is capable of handling the extra data and the number of users wishing to access this data. If they are using Access it is highly likely that they would need to migrate to a more stable database. On the hardware front they would also need to consider whether they need to expand the amount of diskspace they need to cope with the additional data they will be adding on a regular basis. Developing requirements for the system, coming up with the functional specification and then developing and testing the system would take at least six months in my opinion.
Then it comes to the practicalities of adminstering the system. Logging tickets purchased is the easy bit. The problem occurs when actually prioritising applications when they arrive by reference to the information provided by the database. To my mind this would inevitably lead to manually sorting the applications by priority as they arrive prior to actually processing them (in order to ensure absolute fairness), this is clearly much more time consuming than just having a pile from Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday etc. and process them in order from Monday until you run out of tickets.