Ken Newbury
Active member
Now if you really want something to moan about why is a cheesburger around 50p more than a normal burger when the slice of processed cheese only costs around 1p!
Now if you really want something to moan about why is a cheesburger around 50p more than a normal burger when the slice of processed cheese only costs around 1p!
That depends on how much you like cheeseburgers, not my cup of tea
Why do you pay the same price for a cup of tea in a cafe even if you don't take milk or sugar - how is that fair?
Good effort but pointless, the issue is what you want to argue the toss over
Good effort but pointless, the issue is what you want to argue the toss over
Good effort but pointless, the issue is what you want to argue the toss over
The point here is clearly that the cost of milk and sugar is charged to everyone who buys the cup of tea even if they chose not to use it - the cost of travel is charged to everyone who buys the ticket even if they chose not to use it. I've not seen anybody moan about the cost of tea, let alone go to court over it!
Night Night
Anyone can if they are charged twice for something, trust me
The point of the dispute isn't whether a few fans might feel disgruntled about being expected to pay for something they are not using. The point is whether the Club will get permission to expand the stadium.Finally one of the few people who at least understands the point of the dispute.
The point of the dispute isn't whether a few fans might feel disgruntled about being expected to pay for something they are not using. The point is whether the Club will get permission to expand the stadium.
If everyone felt like Beach Hut, we'd never get 30,500 seats and we wouldn't be able to get to the Premier League and stay there.
Why? Because without the support of the Green Party administration, we won't get permission to have the use of the land that will provide extra car parking or park and ride facilities that you and I both believe are necessary.Sorry LB but what difference does that really make, so we all have to roll over for 8,000 more seats, why ?
The current situation works OK so any additional needs are a few more park and rides as no more trains can run.
Are the club to hold everyone to ransom by saying this is the only way we can have 8,000 additional seats
Why? Because without the support of the Green Party administration, we won't get permission to have the use of the land that will provide extra car parking or park and ride facilities that you and I both believe are necessary.
You might feel "held to ransom". I feel that thirty quid is a ransom worth paying.
I'd rather see a levy on every ticket than the introduction of a complicated system of administering rebates that could throw up loads of minor disputes and trivial, unresolved grievances.OK so then why as stated previously should everyone have to pay £30 more - even cyclists and walkers to the ground.
Surely there can be a waiver in place if you can genuinely prove you have paid once to travel to the ground already ?
OK so then why as stated previously should everyone have to pay £30 more - even cyclists and walkers to the ground.
Surely there can be a waiver in place if you can genuinely prove you have paid once to travel to the ground already ?
Jesus Bozza I can see the anger, chill out for once as you just totally go into cyber bully mode when you don't agree with someone.
I'll continue to debate with the more reasoned approach from LB, how can it be that complicated if say the club offer a three week period where the onus is on the STH to prove they have the travel issue paid for the whole duration of the impending season ?
No you won't.I'll continue to debate with the more reasoned approach from LB