He wasn't brilliant in any of those games. Decent enough but didn't change the game in any of them? Spurs was a last minute consolation goal, and he had missed a sitter for the equaliser long before then.
No need for what? For calling out your tedious hypocrisy? That's what Matt did, and he's spot on.
I am aware you posted it on Facebook, but your stroppiness is totally misplaced because that was only a cut and paste from your post on Harty's thread on NSC ffs, which is what I'm referring to.
Imo his best game in the last 2 years was at Wembley where he looked our only threat. Obviously I'd rather think of him as a world beater at this level, but he just wasn't IMO. In a nutshell, he didn't have a quick enough footballing brain. The very best defenders are good enough to manage him because he wasn't quick enough in thought at the point the pass was being delivered to him. That's why he ended up having to try and beat his man 3 times. It looks effective but at this level, the entire back 4 is in place to deal with a cross when it eventually comes.
Whereas ranting about kids not knowing they're born all the while you spend your entire life bleating about everything is just a superb way of conducting yourself.
How do you know I'm not already there? You really are a self absorbed prick. Fck off eh.
