And I’m not arguing with an arrogant, patronising troll.
"Oh yes you are."
And I’m not arguing with an arrogant, patronising troll.
midnight_rendezvous;8293 181 said:If the ‘schools’ (emphasis on the plural) are irrelevant why bring them up in the first place? I didn’t say female employment (reading isn’t your strong point is it?) I said gender pay gap, something which has stalled under the Conservatives. They’re still making some progress (I’m not arrogant enough to claim otherwise), but it’s being reduced at a slower rate than under Labour.
And regarding GDP, although it is a good starting point, by it’s nature it doesn’t show us the ‘full picture’. And, as previously stated, It’s fair to say that GDP has been generally better under Labour.
And if you want sources I’m happy to oblige. Of course, as long as you are also willing to provide sources for your facts also.
midnight_rendezvous;8296 783 said:I never claimed it wasn’t complicated and there were outside factors such as choices, both personal and professional, but the fact remains that men are typically paid more than women who are at a similar stage in their working lives.
https://www.economist.com/news/inte...men-despite-decades-equal-pay-laws-why-gender
Yeah, humble beginnings, like Cameron, Johnson, Rees-Mogg, Soames, Osbourne.etc ect
I used to give MPs the benefit of the doubt relating to background, there is no doubt that a privileged background appears to help ease the privileged into positions of power and influence. These days that is as common in the Labour Party as Tory, and why the likes of Stephen Kinnock are as bad as Rees-Mogg.
But then the Labour Party in my day stood for the working class, today what they say about the working class and what they do are in another galaxy.
It’s why some working class voters will pay more money to attend a Labour Party conference than wealthy Labour MPs like Keith Vaz and the London Mayor.
http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/tories-accuse-labour-racism-over-1096236
You couldn’t make this kind of indefensible and divisive sh!t up could you.
Not true if you compare apples for apples.
Racist just like their cohorts at the BBC
https://creativeaccess.org.uk/opportunity/trainee-multi-media-journalist/
TO APPLY
Please upload your CV and cover letter as one document
This traineeship is only open to candidates from a black, Asian or non-white ethnic minority background
And I’m not arguing with an arrogant, patronising tool.
The thing is the difference between arrogance and confidence is experience, I have signalled I had some you have not therefore the claim you are projecting your arrogance is valid. Also if I am arguing with someone and i have only superficial knowledge of the subject but they signal they have coal face expeience, this is the cue for me to bail or wind my neck in. Obviously your arrogance keeps you going.
You tell yourself what ever helps you sleep at night pal
Absolutely unbelievable .Racist just like their cohorts at the BBC
https://creativeaccess.org.uk/opportunity/trainee-multi-media-journalist/
TO APPLY
Please upload your CV and cover letter as one document
This traineeship is only open to candidates from a black, Asian or non-white ethnic minority background
Absolutely unbelievable .
This is just wrong, but it's not the first time I have seen this. It should be about who is the best for the job, regardless.
It's racist simple as that. Why aren't the antifa raging about it.??