The Andy Naylor Fan Club
Well-known member
Peter Ustinov.
**Cough** Pedant alert....
Peter Ustinov did indeed play fictional Belgian detective Poirot, you picture shows fellow Poirot actor David Suchet.
Peter Ustinov.
I see Labour's leader in the European Parliament,Riohard Corbett,will be cheering on Belgium as the World Cup is "a vulgar tournament to prove our superiority"Does he post on here?
I was already puzzled that we had had to wait for the eighth World Cup to win it — though I learned that this was because we had boycotted the first three world cups (there was no need to participate in a vulgar tournament to prove our superiority); that we had been too nonchalant and complacent the first time we participated in 1950 (when we had lost to a USA team composed of English amateurs); and somewhat unlucky in 1954 (losing to Uruguay), 1958 (when we were undefeated, but failed to qualify from the group stage) and 1962 (losing to the eventual winner, Brazil).
It won't dispel anything if we beat a bunch of Belgian reserves. We've also beaten the big teams in the group stages before, just not in the knockout rounds.Obviously an England win would build momentum and dispell the ‘we’ll fall apart when we face a good team’ chat that seems to be prevalent.
C’mon England! Football’s coming home!
Apart from all the really famous Belgians, can anyone name a famous Belgian?
Bluffing.Roberto Martinez "Our priority is not to win the game tonight"
I remember it all too well. We might have beaten Senegal, we might not. But we probably would have, we were playing very well. If we had, we'd have been favourites against Turkey in an evening game. Instead we played Brazil in searing heat. We started well and Ronald saw his fluky cross go in, and as the game went on we simply couldn't compete in the heat. We had a much better chance of reaching the semi-finals had we have gone the other route.A bit more recent than that in 2002, we finished 2nd in our group to Sweden, which meant we eventually got Brazil in the quarters obviously. That said, it meant we had Denmark in the 2nd round in the cool of the evening, rather than Senegal in the heat of the day who saw off Sweden in extra time. There was no guarantee we'd have beaten Senegal then either and no guarantee we'd have beaten a very good Turkey side in the quarters in the next round, had we gone down the the group winners route, rather than faced Brazil.
I remember it all too well. We might have beaten Senegal, we might not. But we probably would have, we were playing very well. If we had, we'd have been favourites against Turkey in an evening game. Instead we played Brazil in searing heat. We started well and Ronald saw his fluky cross go in, and as the game went on we simply couldn't compete in the heat. We had a much better chance of reaching the semi-finals had we have gone the other route.
C’mon England! Football’s coming home!
Apart from all the really famous Belgians, can anyone name a famous Belgian?
The big question is will he play Stirling?
That's unbelievable.Germany's route to the Final that year was basically a bye:
Saudi Arabia (8-0)
R of Ireland (1-1)
Cameroon (2-0)
Paraguay (1-0)
USA (1-0)
South Korea (1-0)
Even England would probably have navigated through that.
If you go through our whole squad, misspelling all their names, will it start to get funny?The big question is will he play Stirling?
It is a flawed system if losing is a benefit
If you go through our whole squad, misspelling all their names, will it start to get funny?
Really conflicted about this game.
Obviously an England win would build momentum and dispell the ‘we’ll fall apart when we face a good team’ chat that seems to be prevalent.
However finishing 2nd is a much easier route to the final, and from a selfish point of view England to finish on 5 or 6 points could be the last leg of a 37/1 acca I put on before the World Cup started. (Russia 5-6 points, France 6+, Brazil 6+, Colombia 5+)
I don’t know what I want.
If you go through our whole squad, misspelling all their names, will it start to get funny?
I'll take that as a no, but you're going to do it anyway.It was a typo. I’m right behind the Two Lions!
C’mon England! Football’s coming home!
Apart from all the really famous Belgians, can anyone name a famous Belgian?
I remember it all too well. We might have beaten Senegal, we might not. But we probably would have, we were playing very well. If we had, we'd have been favourites against Turkey in an evening game. Instead we played Brazil in searing heat. We started well and Ronald saw his fluky cross go in, and as the game went on we simply couldn't compete in the heat. We had a much better chance of reaching the semi-finals had we have gone the other route.
Germany's route to the Final that year was basically a bye:
Saudi Arabia (8-0)
R of Ireland (1-1)
Cameroon (2-0)
Paraguay (1-0)
USA (1-0)
South Korea (1-0)
Even England would probably have navigated through that.