portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,777
Coming away, overheard two Fulham fans "can't believe they did us again, after we outplayed them again!"
We have the luck of champions
We have the luck of champions
Absolute nonsense - We only stepped up our game for about 10 or 15 mins in both games and each time we turned it around fro a losing to a winning position. Just imagine what we would have done to them if we had decided to turn up for 90 minutes in both matches.
Fulham are definitely a decent side in this league but when we are at ourselves they are no match for us. Not at this point in time anyhow
We absolutely mugged you... again.
That is two games this season where you played really well and arguably should have won both games.
That is the least likely double over a team that I have ever witnessed.
So sorry.
I would also like to say thank you. The 6 points may come in very handy later this year.
I wish you well for the rest of the season, particularly against all of the other teams in the top 6 places (which amusingly still does not include Derby; you might appreciate that much at least).
Everything looked off point in the first half. They closed out our midfield options and forced us in to risky long balls which looked "hit and hope". Sometimes we couldn't even execute simple line balls. Knocky's awful crossfield ball to Murray when the latter was through was symptomatic of a poor half which Bong, Skalak and Bruno in particular will want to forget.
For me, though, it was no coincidence that we improved as soon as Skalak went off. He's not quick enough and there's no point having a dead ball specialist on when you can't get out of your own penalty area.
When we turned it on though, we were sublime. Today was as good as I've seen either Stockdale or Dunk play for us. The absolute SCENES when we scored. I thought my ten year old was attempting a pitch invasion and we were in row ZZ!
Wasn't there today but really liked their positive expansive play at the Amex. Sounds today like they were tiring when we started going through the gears and nicked the goals.
Everything looked off point in the first half. They closed out our midfield options and forced us in to risky long balls which looked "hit and hope". Sometimes we couldn't even execute simple line balls. Knocky's awful crossfield ball to Murray when the latter was through was symptomatic of a poor half which Bong, Skalak and Bruno in particular will want to forget.
For me, though, it was no coincidence that we improved as soon as Skalak went off. He's not quick enough and there's no point having a dead ball specialist on when you can't get out of your own penalty area.
When we turned it on though, we were sublime. Today was as good as I've seen either Stockdale or Dunk play for us. The absolute SCENES when we scored. I thought my ten year old was attempting a pitch invasion and we were in row ZZ!
I remember someone else doing that 25 years ago....
Many times I have asked the Skalak question. To be honest I don't eve know what the answer was even now. I think I got a journalists response. - I also have a feeling that Skalak's stats always come out well but to be honest I really don't know how all the stats stuff works.
I am always gonna be bias in Murphy's corner though so maybe I just didn't pay attention to the response.
Everything looked off point in the first half. They closed out our midfield options and forced us in to risky long balls which looked "hit and hope". Sometimes we couldn't even execute simple line balls. Knocky's awful crossfield ball to Murray when the latter was through was symptomatic of a poor half which Bong, Skalak and Bruno in particular will want to forget.
For me, though, it was no coincidence that we improved as soon as Skalak went off. He's not quick enough and there's no point having a dead ball specialist on when you can't get out of your own penalty area.
When we turned it on though, we were sublime. Today was as good as I've seen either Stockdale or Dunk play for us. The absolute SCENES when we scored. I thought my ten year old was attempting a pitch invasion and we were in row ZZ!
Murphy looks the better player of the two for me. I think CH uses Skalak for his delivery and to make us less open away from home but I don't think we necessarily defend better. Bong looks terrified playing with him. Bong works slightly better with Murphy and much better with Lua Lua - IMHO.
Heard a Fulham group saying that we'll come straight back down again. They have belief in our season. Thanks Fulham, hope our second X1 play you in the 4th round of the cup.
For me Skalak is the kind of player you want at home when you know the opposition are going to sit in and frustrate you. His delivery is what's needed to break a team down. I much prefer Murphy away from home where his pace adds a threatI think Bong is reluctant to push on ahead of Skalak in case he loses the ball and he is caught up field. Murphy seldom loses the ball in possession. If he cant beat his man he will find a team mate inside so Bong is less likely to have to be chasing back. That gives Bong more confidence and freedom.
I don't get the Skalak thing at all - He doesn't always take the free kicks when we get them anyhow
For me Skalak is the kind of player you want at home when you know the opposition are going to sit in and frustrate you. His delivery is what's needed to break a team down. I much prefer Murphy away from home where his pace adds a threat
Does anyone who was there (or i guess anyone who wasn't) think the half of football Fulham had to play on Friday had any bearing on our resurgence late in the game?