Baldseagull
Well-known member
Indeed, and that's out of date and it's time it changed.
No it doesn't. That's like saying 'There's a house with 4 people living in it, and 100% of the people have guns, and they haven't killed each other, so that's proof that high gun ownership doesn't cause gun deaths'.
There are many more people in Chicago, so there is obviously likely to be more crime.
Suicides that might not happen if it weren't for owning a gun.
Didn't you introduce stricter gun laws after a mass shooting in Australia? And how many mass shootings have you had since then?
That part of the reason is out of date. There is still an attachment for those reasons though. But the other reason of facilitating self defence can be argued for, particularly in more rural areas.