Bevendean Hillbilly
New member
I’m not naming it because I don’t want folk buying it online without clinical supervision.
Are you saying that charities had no interest in pursuing an off the shelf (I presume that's what you mean by 'generic'?) addiction remedy because it would put them out of business?
I was the marketing lead for this. We did the entire piece. Looked into alternate funding routes and discussed with a lot of NHS addiction service leads, the MHRA and NHS England. There was no getting around the fact that the generic pharma houses would have jumped on board within 5 minutes.
We looked at altering the formulation to make it a different presentation but that wasn’t enough of a differentiator to change prescribers to a brand.
The ethical thing to do would have been for the Government to fund the development cycle and alert prescribers to the efficacy. That way the addicts would receive the treatment they need. The issue here is that there is a very healthy market in private hands (priory etc) that would lose millions if addiction to alcohol was managed chemically...their lobby would certainly object. Charities too really have no interest in a “cure”;for addiction. They need a reason to exist after all.
It’s sad. But it’s certainly true.
Also. There isn’t a mechanism in Government to influence this.
It’s not off the shelf. It’s a generic prescription only medicine.
Charities don’t own or fund pharmaceutical licence variations.
It’s down to a Pharma company to identify, develop, conduct a large scale clinical trial, submit an application to vary an existing licence, manufacture, change prescribing information, conduct stability testing, put in place a post launch surveillance strategy, package, get marketing authorisation, develop distribution channels, hire sales reps, take out appropriate insurance against claimants who are potentially harmed by a change of indication. Launch.
All of this can cost millions.
At which point a cheap generic house claims a “me too” licence and hoovers up the profit.
Out of interest, how did the drug work, as the FDA has three such drugs approved for alcohol disorder?
One makes you sick if you drink even a small amount. One allows you to get drunk, but suppresses the pleasure associated. The last one eases withdrawal symptoms.
If yours is significantly different and with such high efficacy, I'm sure crowd funding would easily cover the costs of licencing.
I’ve always been a drinker.
I stopped on January 2nd, after finishing an open bottle of Sauvignon Blanc on the 1st left over from NYE and I’ve not had a drop since. It’s been something like 190 days now.
I will return to having a drink, likely on July 24th on the first day of our family holiday but I’m pretty sure I won’t return to drinking the same volume as I have previously.
It’s amazing how quickly I’ve lost the habit of drinking - I now never consider it routinely at the end of the day, on weekend evenings nor when out when I would nearly always be drinking.
Totally this. People ask me if I've given up drinking. I say no - I could have a beer tomorrow. I just don't need or want one. It's been a complete mind shift. I'm still a bit amazed by it. Out with a client last night for drinks and food, and I just stuck with tap water. Still had a great evening. Woke up feeling sprightly, the others apparently did not.
I’ve always been a drinker.
I stopped on January 2nd, after finishing an open bottle of Sauvignon Blanc on the 1st left over from NYE and I’ve not had a drop since. It’s been something like 190 days now.
I will return to having a drink, likely on July 24th on the first day of our family holiday but I’m pretty sure I won’t return to drinking the same volume as I have previously.
It’s amazing how quickly I’ve lost the habit of drinking - I now never consider it routinely at the end of the day, on weekend evenings nor when out when I would nearly always be drinking.
...my aim is to give up booze completely, so any tips would be welcomeI am on day three? Cheers.