Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Albion Archives - use of footage (FAO 1066)
- Thread starter The Great Cornholio
- Start date
Edward Scissorhands
New member
- Feb 20, 2005
- 6,979
Marc said:
Brilliant
EDIT: Damn you and your quick editing.
Last edited:
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,285
The clips will be gone soon i expect. 1066 is only trying to get some footage out im sure he didn't try to offend.
The Great Cornholio
New member
- Thread starter
- #24
DAMANCLAY said:
The point is - he PM'd me about me putting them on Google Video and I explained why I didn't want that to happen. So he did it anyway.
Over enthusiasm can only be used as an excuse so many times.
The Great Cornholio
New member
- Thread starter
- #25
Now removed - thank you.
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,285
The Great Cornholio said:
Fair enough TGC. Least you asked in a polite way, I would have been tempted to go into one!
Kent Seagull
Well-known member
Personally I find it very irritating when people copy material from another website and pass it of as their own. It's just downright lazy (aside from the copyright issues). I once found a young lad who copied material from one of my websites and even used one of my photographs as a prize. It's really infuriating when you've taken the time to build a website that has some original content only for some fuckwit to steal it in an attempt to make their own pathetic efforts look good. If it's already on the internet, what is the point in repeating it on yet another site? If you have to copy other people's material you really shouldn't bother.
Springal said:Nor can you be arsed to read his posts where he explains everything
No, I'm not stupid thanks.
TGC claims he has contacted the club, but do you really think they own the copyright to the goals he has recorded from Sky Sports (who he hasn't asked and who wouldn't let him have them even if he did)?
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,285
Kent Seagull said:
He didn't pass it off as his own tho did he.
Kent Seagull
Well-known member
DAMANCLAY said:
The point is, why put stuff on another site when it's already available to anyone with internet access? There's far to many sites churning out the same old stuff copied from elsewhere. Bloody infuriating when you're searching for something different.
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,285
Kent Seagull said:
That wasn't the point you tried to make tho. He just tried to make it more accessable FFS if this had been done by someone else there wouldn't be nearly three pages on it.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
A fair point, except ...DAMANCLAY said:
The Great Cornholio said:
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,285
Lord Bracknell said:
Yeah, I still dont think there would have been 3 pages about this if it was for example me or edward scissorhands.
The Large One
Who's Next?
No, there wouldn't.
But then, in 99% of cases, the person would - or should - have said 'Sorry, I will remove it', and do so, rather than bluster their way trying to justify their unjustifiable actions and landing someone else in trouble.
If TGC is going to get into trouble, I suspect he would at least like to be able to control how it is handled.
But then, in 99% of cases, the person would - or should - have said 'Sorry, I will remove it', and do so, rather than bluster their way trying to justify their unjustifiable actions and landing someone else in trouble.
If TGC is going to get into trouble, I suspect he would at least like to be able to control how it is handled.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,249
Lord Bracknell said:
Now go and re-read TGC's original message, 1066.
How come it's always this complete and utter DILDO's name that comes up time and time again? Has there ever BEEN a more pointless, consistently annoying poster? (Not you TGC, that would be borderline harsh
)
Last edited:
jonogulls said:No, I'm not stupid thanks.
TGC claims he has contacted the club, but do you really think they own the copyright to the goals he has recorded from Sky Sports (who he hasn't asked and who wouldn't let him have them even if he did)?
With jonogulls on that one. Neither of you should really be doing it (not that I really care and if you want to rip off Rupert Murodoch it is fine by me).
The Great Cornholio
New member
- Thread starter
- #39
jonogulls said:No, I'm not stupid thanks.
TGC claims he has contacted the club, but do you really think they own the copyright to the goals he has recorded from Sky Sports (who he hasn't asked and who wouldn't let him have them even if he did)?
Yet again, you ignore half of what I said. Namely this part :-
I am fully aware that I am infringing copyright - as do the vast number of users on here who cut and paste text from other websites or link to pictures without permission. But at least I am selective about what I use - as far as I am aware, none of the footage I use is currently from a current commerical source. Unlike the other 2 videos 1066 had posted which were blatantly ripped from Seagulls World.
TBH, I couldn't give a toss whether people think it is hypocritical or not. I am merely stating the terms under which I will continue to host existing and future footage. If anyone feels the need to replicate the process and publish my material elsewhere, so be it. No skin off my nose to take down the site - it would save me £50 a year and free up a lot of time. If someone is so offended by the copyright infringments, same applies. At the end of the day, it was me that spent hours getting together this footage and me that would get the Cease and Desist. If I am not in control of the footage then I am not prepared to carry on hosting it.
Hopefully this will put an end to the matter. It should and would have been a one or two post thread if 1066 had made the correct decision of respecting my wishes straight away.
Last edited:
