Third.
....and are we really getting our £7M back in loan fees?
No, they won't get it back off one loan but if, for example, there is a 500k loan fee then that's 1.5m we'll get paid over those three loans and then if we can sell him for say 1.5-2m then we've got half the fee back, paid minimal wages so haven't lost too much.Third.
....and are we really getting our £7M back in loan fees? It hasn't been mentioned as a loan-to-buy, has it? - I don't think SPL teams (apart from Celtic) can afford £7M anyway.
Is it? I know(or think i know!) the model is buy low and take a 'punt' on young players with promise, knowing that some won't work out but I'd assume that the club would want to minimise each loss as much as possible.It is in isolation, but in the context of Albion transfer dealings a £7m 'loss' is a perfectly acceptable price to pay, tor the business model Mr Bloom wishes to follow.
Kind of. I was wondering how much, if any, of the original outlay we have made back through the loans.That's the question @Gary Nelson's Left Foot was posing, I think.
We certainly won't have recouped anything like that yet but time will tell. He just tried 22 last week.
Fingers crossed he has a break out season with Rangers or elsewhere. Then either he links back up with us or we sell him on.
I don't get why some think that we need to recoup more for every single player we sign.
If Sima goes to Rangers, it'll be his third loan, the others being Stoke (that didn't go well) and Angers which went better -- but 4 in 30 apps doesn't exactly promise him burning up the upper echelons of the PL and EL
A very good move. Beale (Rangers Manager) has cleared out a lot of players and is starting pretty much afresh. Beale is obviously a good manager and a season in the more agricultural SPL will help Sima's development in particular the physicality element of his game.This guy was very good at Slavia Prague.. but this does feel like make or break. A good season in Scotland and his value could rise again
Kind of. I was wondering how much, if any, of the original outlay we have made back through the loans.
I am as aware as anybody else that we can't expect to make a profit on every player who passes through our books - but we can't afford to lose too many either. It's increasingly looking likey that we won't recoup the £7M we spent on Sima (and if I'm wrong I'll be absolutely delighted) ... but also on the last few days a couple of bright sparks from our very good PL2 team of the last year or two have also walked on a free.Aside from the transfer fee we paid and any loan fees receive, there's no guarantee that we won't have been covering a %age of his wages.
A £7m acquisition at a Premier League club is going to be earning a decent amount, and it's not inconceivable that neither Stoke nor Angers would have been able to pick up 100% of his pay.
3rd - he’s already been on loan at Stoke and AngersWould Rangers be his second or third loan with us?
Basically, are we getting our money back as it doesn't look like he'll be troubling the first team any time soon and 7m is a heftyish outlay.
The sort of player who could smash the SPL.This guy was very good at Slavia Prague.. but this does feel like make or break. A good season in Scotland and his value could rise again
The sort of player who could smash the SPL.
Good luck to him.
The sort of player who could smash the SPL.
Good luck to him.
Agreed. But it’s the SPL. The showreel sadly indicates that he might never play for us.As show reels go, that's not particularly impressive. Still young though I suppose.
Or it might "click" and he turns out to be a smasher. He's still young.Agreed. But it’s the SPL. The showreel sadly indicates that he might never play for us.