TWOCHOICEStom
Well-known member
As a Brighton fan, would you prefer to have Aaron Mooy in our squad or not have Aaron Mooy in our squad?
Exactly. So stop moaning.
Exactly. So stop moaning.
Presumably one of the '2' in a 4-2-3-1, or one of the 'Central 2 of 4' in a 3-4-3.Out of our current ACM/no.10's (Propper & Gross), it'll be interesting to see whose place Mooy takes.
Yep, all a bit unnecessary. Mooy is a very good addition to the squad...........don't see him immediately displacing what we have.
lets get this done early, then we can order lots of 'o's for the club shop for the '4 letter cheapskates' to put on their shirts...
Yep, all a bit unnecessary. Mooy is a very good addition to the squad...........don't see him immediately displacing what we have.
**** me, I'm usually sanguine about all this stuff - but the constant upgrade on Stephens bollocks is grinding my gears.
180 games for the club and 75 in the PL. Give the bloke a chance to play under a more attacking coach.
A quick scan of social media reveals quite a few Burnley fans who are quite annoyed that they haven’t been in for Mooy. This pleases me.
Seven goals in 65 in the PL. Hmmm ................. not that prolific, eh?Good deal. Saw the highlights of Huddersfield's opening fixture. Mooy drilled a shot from outside the box inches wide of the beaten Derby keeper.
Certainly a midfielder that isn't shy in getting strikes in on goal. Seem to remember him getting a couple of goals away at Wolves last season. At least one was a powerful free-kick.
**** me, I'm usually sanguine about all this stuff - but the constant upgrade on Stephens bollocks is grinding my gears.
180 games for the club and 75 in the PL. Give the bloke a chance to play under a more attacking coach.
Seven goals in 65 in the PL. Hmmm ................. not that prolific, eh?
Seven goals in 65 in the PL. Hmmm ................. not that prolific, eh?
Seven goals in 65 in the PL. Hmmm ................. not that prolific, eh?
Seven goals in 65 in the PL. Hmmm ................. not that prolific, eh?