METALMICKY
Well-known member
- Jan 30, 2004
- 6,837
When I first saw this I instantly blamed the bike rider for travelling too fast. Take away the speed, take away the risk.
However, in this instance, the car driver did not see the bike, this has been admitted. Even on what appears to be a long, straight approach road on a clear day, the bike was not seen until too late. Fact.
Therefore, surely the question we should asking and which would be of more benefit to future road safety, is why the bike was not seen. If we know the reasons we can come up with solutions. Here are the possible reasons the bike wasn't seen:
1. It's dark colours blended with the surroundings. The speed of the bike maybe exacerbated this.
2. The car driver got distracted so didn't look properly
3. The car driver's mind was subconsciously looking for approaching cars only so failed to do a full sweep of the approach. Complacency?
4. The car driver's sight is not 100%
5. The bike was caught in some kind of blind spot, perhaps behind the car's windscreen side stanchion.
IMO there are easy, cheap things that can be implemented to address some of the above. For example, blaring bike headlights that can't be switched off, banning black leathers in favour of fluorescent orange ones -may look uncool but may save lives, improved designs for car windscreens etc
Bottom line, if car had seen bike, car would have waited.
Point no.5 is very relevant in relation to modern car design. With a new family I recently had to purchase a Zafira which whilst ticking so many practicality boxes has a really poor windscreen pillar. However, this seems to be a problem with lots of modern cars and not just people carriers.