dsr-burnley
Well-known member
- Aug 15, 2014
- 2,633
Yes, well if you want to get emotional about it, what about baby carrots? Ripped out of the soil before they have had the chance to live a fulfilled life?If they cared about their animals they wouldn't subject them to forced impregnation, rip those babies away from their mothers while the mothers cry out for them and then murder those babies while they're still suffering separation anxiety.
You can't be an animal farmer and care for your animals.
If you love animals and want to support farmers, eat plants. Plants are still grown by farmers in case you didn't realise.
I know there is a nice idea that cows would be much better off dead and the kindest thing to do would be to kill them all now. And of course the alternative view that cows should be allowed to roam free and wild where they would of course still be subject to forced impregnation, but at least the bulls would be able to have a fair fight about who got to do it. And the losing bull would have died eventually, so does it really matter if it takes a few days for it to starve to death after being maimed?
Which alternative do you support? Would you kill them all now or let them roam free? Or have you a better idea?
Animals in the wild do not have vets and do not have euthanasia. They die horrible deaths. Yes, there is the possibility that animals are better freely foraging for their own food and starving in their own way if they can't find it, and treatment from a vet or from a farmer is just interfering with nature. And there is also the possibility that animals actually don't mind being kept (prisoner if you like) in a field (and brought inside when it's cold) and someone ensures they have plenty to eat and don't spend their last days in agony.