sydney
tinky ****in winky
6-((1x0)+2) /2=2........oh the answer is 2....
now you're just being silly.
EDIT - strangely your next post gets it right:
i dont get it, though the answer was 3.5!!!
6-1 = 5
x0 = 5
+2 = 7
/2 = 3.5
Am I being thick? (which out reading 4 165 messages!)
i dont get it, though the answer was 3.5!!!
6-1 = 5
x0 = 5
+2 = 7
/2 = 3.5
Am I being thick?
Yes you are.
Yes, because 5 x 0 does not equal 5.
Indeed. Doing addition before subtraction, and ignoring order, is simply wrong. I don't know if it matters if you always do subtraction before addition, perhaps someone can give an example if that does matter. Same with division and multiplication, does it matter if you do one before the other?To be fair I was never taught that A+S and M+D (easier writing them that way) were of equal precedence, but I guess I've naturally interpreted it the right way anyway!
Ok, fair enough. I just got confused when you said -1 x 0, as I don't think I noticed/understood your + sign after the six.My maths teacher always taught me to read a subtract sign as adding a negative number, so I'm not being that silly, it works and it still leads to the right answer.
When you've worked out that it's 7, join the queue for the English lesson.i did no that as well!! too excited about tonight!!
No I actually don't. 100-10+10=100, right? -10+100+10=100 so does 10-10+100. I can not see how to get 80 at all.
Subtraction is simply the addition of a negative number.
2-1=1. This is the same as saying 2+(-1)=1. They are the same. The same applies for division. 10/5=2. This is the same as 10*0.2=2. They are the same as 1/5 IS 0.2. No?
Already answered above, but to explain some more:No I actually don't. 100-10+10=100, right? -10+100+10=100 so does 10-10+100. I can not see how to get 80 at all.
Come on Bozza. Put us out of our misery.1is the answer right?
Doing calculus in A-level, it's actually much less confusing using the latter method when dealing with many different functions and having negatives of negatives of negatives of negatives, etc.
How do you get 20 from -10+10!? You can get 20 from 10+10, but we don't have that one is -10 the other is 10.
-10+10=0 so does +10-10=0.
There is no negative 10. That's where you're getting this all wrong. You want to create a negative 10 because that's the way you like to do it, but it's not in the equation to start with.How do you get 20 from -10+10!?
That is wrong, as I've explained above. For it to be a -10 there would need to be another operation before it, telling you what to do with that -10. Is it 100 times -10, or divided by -10? No, it's 100 minus 10 (or 100 plus -10).You can get 20 from 10+10, but we don't have that one is -10 the other is 10.
Already answered above, but to explain some more:
Let's swap the + to a x:
100 - 10 x 10
here we all know you do the multiplication first so that simplifies to 100 - 100 which = 0.
Now swap the x back to a +, and if the order didn't matter, and you did addition before subtraction (because you say order doesn't matter), then
100 - 10 + 10 would simplify to 100 - 20 which = 80.
So you can see that you mustn't do the addition before the subtraction, unless it is to the left.
EDIT - obviously I appreciate that you could swap the -10 to a + -10, so your equation would go from 100 - 10 + 10 to 100 + -10+10, giving you the correct answer (100 + 0), and that's fine, but let's not pretend it's simply doing the addition first. It's finding a way around the problem of doing the addition first. So you can say the order doesn't matter if you apply my special work around, but that work around isn't a given. It's also easier subtract positive numbers in your head than it is to add negative numbers.