Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
bang on the money there Rev , how ironic after the brown noser thread the other daylick lick lick nose nose nose lick!
regards
DR
bang on the money there Rev , how ironic after the brown noser thread the other daylick lick lick nose nose nose lick!
I did yesterday and people tried to ignore it ,Bozza brings it up and some people wake up
lick lick lick nose nose nose lick!
bang on the money there Rev , how ironic after the brown noser thread the other day
regards
DR
Your named cropped up by the way , there's a trend developing with crowd figures and it's a slipping trend can't you see thatAbsolutely the reverse a sensible debate as opposed to the same repeated hidden agenda when raised by one person
so from that assumption you've got to say there's quite a lot of people within Brighton itself that don't fancy these prices ,I'm not quite sure that's the case. I and countless others have said the same about match day prices.
If you live in, say, Worthing and catch the train to a game a category C North Stand ticket for £25 looks remarkably good value as it's also covering you for c£8 of rail fare.
If you live in Brighton (or otherwise derive no real financial benefit from the inclusive travel) a £42 ticket for a category A game, for example against Charlton, looks very expensive indeed.
Clearly there are a number of different use cases that sit between these extreme examples.
In short football is starting to alienate people on lower incomes who simply cant afford a matchday with all the trimmings a lot of us take for granted and it bloody stinks , it would be fantastic if the club took the lead and did away with cat matches at the very least.
that would be a start ,but do the club want unemployed people in the groundI totally agree with this. Once upon a time football was the 'common' cathedral. Now it's corporate, with 'customers' not supporters. Time to give concessions when POG for anyone unemployed.
This is my first and last warning on this as I'm getting very tired of both your trollsome ways now. If you can't engage like adults, just don't bother at all please.
that would be a start ,but do the club want unemployed people in the ground
regards
DR
How would the club know someone was unemployed, if a ticket was paid for?
The club are paying the price for the absolute ABOMINATION of last season. We lost 3000 sth's and a lot of people were rightly angry at the way it was going and having the piss taken. The total lack of investment in the team for 2 years, relying on average at best loanees who did not give a rat's arse, selling any decent player we had for a year or 2 and most bizarrely Tony Bloom keeping hold of a Manager a 5 year old could see was clueless by early October. You don't do that without any consequences. Luckily Bloom gathered his Marbles back and appointed the best manager outside the Premiership, got his wallet out again and is the mirror opposite of last season. 23000 against MK Dons with awful weather is a decent turnout bearing in mind all of the above
I'm sure they could provide the relevant information required although it wouldn't be a UB40How would the club know someone was unemployed, if a ticket was paid for?
Bit like chemists and prescriptions I would think.
Although Hughton is getting results he has erroded our style of play. This probably has a large effect. If you are a floating fan, why go and see another generic football team playing generic football? We should have retained our style.
But why just the unemployed? What about the people doing sh1t jobs for very low pay because they think it's the right thing to do to try and support themselves? Aren't they equally deserving?I totally agree with this. Once upon a time football was the 'common' cathedral. Now it's corporate, with 'customers' not supporters. Time to give concessions when POG for anyone unemployed.
yes but to be honest I don't think they're seen as a viable option these days , cynical marketing ploys to attract " the right customer " what do you reckon ?But why just the unemployed? What about the people doing sh1t jobs for very low pay because they think it's the right thing to do to try and support themselves? Aren't they equally deserving?
I wasn't referring to your suggestion, as you posted after me.
The club is not a charity.
The only way ticket prices are going to come down, is when players get a lot less money. That will involve all clubs working together with the PFA, and I can't see it happening.
But why just the unemployed? What about the people doing sh1t jobs for very low pay because they think it's the right thing to do to try and support themselves? Aren't they equally deserving?