It was someone else. Not sure who though.So the elbow missed. Did their player then go down injured, from no contact? Or was it someone else on the floor?
It was someone else. Not sure who though.So the elbow missed. Did their player then go down injured, from no contact? Or was it someone else on the floor?
Must have been smoking the exact same thing as the entire non-Brighton-fan world then.What have you been smoking tonight?! It was never a red card. He was never in danger of hitting his head. Petulant maybe but not violent or likely to connect .
The elbow missed by a fair margin. From memory Ben Mee went down unrelated and was subbed off.So the elbow missed. Did their player then go down injured, from no contact? Or was it someone else on the floor?
Clattenburg explained that it couldn't be a red, under the rules of the game, as there was no contact.
He said intent has nothing to do with it, so whether Pedro did intend to connect or not, makes no difference.
So tonight seems to be a cast-iron non-red by the letter of the law.
If that is the law as it stands, then he's definitely lucky. How anyone can say "never a red" is beyond me if the law is that a player only has to attempt to use excessive force to be sent off.
It wasn’t fine but it was never a red card. No tinted glasses on, just saw what happened in real time at the match and on TV when I got home. Player pulls Perdo back, Pedro raises his elbow in frustration which was nowhere near the Brentford player.Must have been smoking the exact same thing as the entire non-Brighton-fan world then.
If people see that situation, think its fine and don't understand that the "its fine" part comes from having tinted glasses... people need to increase their level of self-analysis.
Deluded.It wasn’t fine but it was never a red card. No tinted glasses on, just saw what happened in real time at the match and on TV when I got home. Player pulls Perdo back, Pedro raises his elbow in frustration which was nowhere near the Brentford player.
Stick to your mushroom pizzasDeluded.
... people need to increase their level of self-analysis.
It wasn’t fine but it was never a red card. No tinted glasses on, just saw what happened in real time at the match and on TV when I got home. Player pulls Perdo back, Pedro raises his elbow in frustration which was nowhere near the Brentford player.
Slight amendmentClattenburg said: "If we look at the laws of the game as it's written, it has to be to strike an opponent or attempt to strike an opponent. Because there was no contact he can't be sent off the field of play for the contact. Therefore, it's whether he attempted to strike the opponent. The more I look at it, because it's an unusual action, especially from behind he is looking towards Andy Madley when he swings his arm. He keeps his arm quite close to his body and I think it's more of a gesture to the referee.
That was Clattenburg - suppose the point is only Joao and some posters know what his intent is. He may have meant it he may not but no one saw enough to suggest he did.
Clear as a day for anyone who isn't a blind person living in a fantasy world.
Clear as day that the player had gone way past him and the gesture was symbolic and he had no intention of hitting him.Clear as a day for anyone who isn't a blind person living in a fantasy world.
The elbow missed by a fair margin.