Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,365
I was 12 in 1971, a lot of the albums I have mentioned I didn’t hear for at least 10-15 years after their release. Far more from this year have gone on to be acknowledged as either seminal or classic albums than many other years. It’s not just me who thinks this, What’s going on, Tapestry, Blue, Hunky Dory, among others, are all acknowledged to be classics that will be remembered as groundbreaking/genius long after many that came after have been long forgotten.
And ,by the way, I can’t stand Joni Mitchell’s music , but I do understand why people do.
I think 9-13 is the age you generally go back to. That would fit for me in terms of 1979. I think that Joni has made some of the greatest albums ever made. I'd give you Blue, What's Going On & Tapestry as genre defining classics. I'm not much of a Bowie fan but guess that most fans would consider Hunky Dory to be one of his best. I am a massive fan of the Kinks and like Muswell Hillbillies a lot, but there are at least three of their albums that are better. I'd say similar about Van: Tupelo Honey is not as good as Moondance and nowhere near Astral Weeks. Meddle is not one of Pink Floyd's better albums. It's certainly nowhere near The Wall. The Who album and The Stones one are very strong contenders in their catalogues. I have absolutely no time for Rod Stewart, who'd spent his earlier professional career obsessed with Sam Cooke, learned absolutely nothing and would be describing Enoch Powell as 'The Man' within five years of 1971.
My point was not that 1971 didn't have some great albums, but that it was in no way a year without parallel. I don't think any year in pop/rock music has no parallel. There is one in jazz though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKYa3wwc1SU