What reassures me most about this thread - and comments around the Amex recently - is that now there is a real chance of losing Ashley Barnes, it seems the majority of knockers are now accepting that he is in fact a decent striker and would be a loss. Of course there are better out there - but...
And we had a different manager at the time. Do you think that had an influence? Could that affect the way we have/will approach the Barnes negotiations?
But saying we should just get one - and getting one - are completely different things. I'd love us to be able to borrow a season-changing Jason Roberts kind of player - but they are few and far between. We've seen FAR more duds (from that professional scouting network) than we have successes...
I thought that would be obvious. Where is this miraculous loan striker that will be better than a proven striker we already have that will fit in with our way of playing and won't cost a fortune? Leroy Lita didn't seem to work.
Not sure that's what's been said. I understood that he'll be back in training at end of Jan. Even if that is so - and we've had a few false dawns on CMS - then he won't be trained and match fit for perhaps another month and with no assurance that the injury won't cause him to be more injury...
Seriously? I think you're doing this on purpose now. What are the alternatives?
- sell Barnes and pocket the £750k (always assuming that is what we'd get offered). That leaves us with one fit first team striker who has had major injuries this season and who plays a physical game. It also looks...
You're missing the point. My view is that w need Barnes today and for this season more than we need 750k.
Also it was suggested that we should sell him and buy a new strike for the same money. I'd prefer we keep Barnes. That would be the £0 striker you are looking for.