Search results

Really , then why are tube drivers paid significantly more ?id also like to know your thoughts on unreasonable industrial action called by the RMT, there were plenty of instances of it over drivers during Bob Crows tenure.

There are enough drivers who are RMT members for Bob Crow to wield enough power to frighten the LUL management whilst he was in power, read the rest of my posts , I'm on the union side in this dispute. As for the part about unreasonable action, I can remember a driver from Acton who was off sick...

there are a lot of people wanting to do that job.

I'd say it's probably around a 30k a year job, but good luck to you with whatever you earn, I for one don't begrudge you any of it.

Because Bob crow threatened industrial action(often unreasonably) so often !

Sounds reasonable to me too.

you need to lay off the hallucinogenic drugs mate.

Im sure he'll answer for himself in due course but i suspect the point he's trying to make is that yet again the majority are having to change for the (at present) minority, and that eventually this country will become unrecognisable , there are many things that are not necessarily an intrinsic...

ive read the original article and ive just reread your post , i stand by everything ive said to you , you literally sicken me with your insipid comments and constant droning on about sensitivity , you were probably neville chamberlaibn in a previous life , you and people like you wont be happy...

That wasnt what he said though, ferrari clearly said 'why are you supporting a drunk driver' for his opening question.

spot on.

This.

With insipid, ridiculously acquiescent tossers like you around its no wonder these people think they can take the piss, this country is finished in its present form if people like you become the majority, you literally cant wait to bend over and grab your ankles with these people and their...

Hooray !! youve managed it !! youll be getting one of those mobile phone things next :lolol:

you see this is a perfect example, i can guess this reply is to me, and your other ones to buzzer where you mention 'buzzboy'( are you really in your sixties ? you dont act it) but other less specific replies could be to anybody , and your incisive wit and repartee will be wasted.

seems a bit of a waste of time replying to me then :lolol: things a bit fuzzy and confusing today are they ?

genuinely tickled me that :lolol:

because i might leave the thread and not know that youve replied to me , using the quote function guarantees that i know youve replied, never mind , youre bound to be confused, its an age thing.

still having trouble with the quote function then ?:lolol:

buzz boy ??:lolol: you go from bad to worse :facepalm: