Search results

I will clarify - Murray often backs in and/or falls over and gets fouls that I don't think are fouls, but he's good at conning refs. The ref obviously knows this and didn't want to fall for it. But he went the other way and got some decisions wrong. Of course if Murray is actually fouled, then...

I think he thought Murray was looking for fouls, which to be fair he does a lot, but perhaps he let that cloud his judgement to a certain extent - I'm not sure what the yellow card was about. It was the same when he reffed us last season (didn't want to give Murray much). But apart from that he...

The yellow for Murray was a joke. Not as bad as his performance when he reffed our match at home to Spurs last season, though. He smiled as he got boo'd off, at both HT and FT if I recall correctly. He wasn't impressed with Murray that day either.

Home support, being used to playing at a particular venue, psychology, tactics employed by both teams, etc. It makes sense there should be a difference, although perhaps not the extent of the difference that we see!

Montoya and AK 7? Don't think so. At least an 8 each.

That's the quality we know he has and why it's so frustrating that he often doesn't produce it. Hopefully he can keep it up - if so he'll be difficult to dislodge from the team.

Great performance from March, that's the player we know he can be, which is why it's so frustrating that he often doesn't perform to that level. Hopefully he can keep it up and get an extended run in the team.

???

That's why Hughton knows best. Some ridiculous suggestions in this thread.

You, since you opened this thread.

Interesting thread.

Poyet was also suspended by Brighton in 2013 for an alleged breach of contract. He was consequently fired by the Seagulls, and learnt the news while working on a live BBC Match of the Day programme. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45220878 Hmm, seems BBC need to be corrected here.

Who's confused? Your figures were bollocks and still are. I'm not sure what there is to be confused about. The most correct figures are the IFS ones, although it would actually be cheaper now. Just because I didn't provide the link in the first post doesn't mean you should ignore it - you could...

I'm a separate person, as should be obvious. I'm not involved in the debate. I don't think either side is coming across particularly well in the debate. I just noticed some incorrect figures being bandied about and wanted to correct them. It's important that debates are based on accurate...

And I already point out that this is bollocks yet you continue to cite your incorrect figures. You've clearly been given the correct information so it shouldn't be hard. Unless you are purposely ignoring the correct figures to make your point?

As I have already point out more than once, and as you continue to ignore, it wouldn't cost £14bn. Perhaps you should try re-reading the posts in this thread. Or does accuracy not matter to you?

Obviously. But you said check the ingredients for batter, seemingly implying that the batter contains dairy. 99% of the time fish batter will not contain any dairy. Normally, it's just flour, water and raising agents. Sometimes places try to fancy it up by adding beer. You don't add dairy...